11-07-2024 03:46 AM - edited 11-07-2024 03:52 AM
Hello support,
I have a question regarding ospf with multiple areas, it's possible to have a area dehind another area outside zone 0?
Attached is the diagram, can we have area 10 ?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-07-2024 03:51 AM
Yes you can use virtual link
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/47866-ospfdb7.html
MHM
11-07-2024 04:09 AM
Yes You need it since area 10 can not direct connect to backbone area 0
MHM
11-07-2024 04:18 AM
Remember, when creating your virtual link you should use you ospf router ID.
11-07-2024 01:41 PM
Hello
based on your topology-why not have that rtr in the same area so no need for a VL?
11-08-2024 04:36 AM - edited 11-08-2024 04:38 AM
Is it possible, yes. Will it work correctly, not without some additional configuration.
Others have explained using virtual link or not having the separate remote area
Other possible options would be to use tunnels and/or a separate VLAN, to either extend the remote area to an ABR, or extend area zero to that area.
11-08-2024 04:55 AM
Possibly overkill, but I would consider insuring each area has a physical attachment to area zero.
If you do that, you have two choices, which are, extend site's area up to HQ ABR, or make site WAN router an ABR. There are pluses and minuses to both approaches, also impacted by advanced Cisco OSPF configuration options.
11-07-2024 03:51 AM
Yes you can use virtual link
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/47866-ospfdb7.html
MHM
11-07-2024 03:56 AM
Okay, that means if you use this scenario, you must therefore use the virtual link?
11-07-2024 04:09 AM
Yes You need it since area 10 can not direct connect to backbone area 0
MHM
11-07-2024 04:25 AM
Okay, many thanks, will read the document sent.
11-07-2024 05:15 AM
Hello,
Last thing please, how can i know the number of routers in an area?
11-07-2024 04:18 AM
Remember, when creating your virtual link you should use you ospf router ID.
11-07-2024 04:29 AM
@MHM Cisco World is correct that a virtual link can be used to achieve this. I just want to add that you should avoid this situation if possible. If you do find yourself in a situation where you have to use a virtual link, you should only rely on this as a temporary fix.
11-07-2024 01:41 PM
Hello
based on your topology-why not have that rtr in the same area so no need for a VL?
11-08-2024 04:03 AM
Hi Paul driver
you proposition is correct. In my case, i have manys sites connected one after one by WAN links (each site is a different city).
So, to separate things, i think it's better to put each site on a separate area.
Regards
11-08-2024 04:55 AM
Possibly overkill, but I would consider insuring each area has a physical attachment to area zero.
If you do that, you have two choices, which are, extend site's area up to HQ ABR, or make site WAN router an ABR. There are pluses and minuses to both approaches, also impacted by advanced Cisco OSPF configuration options.
11-08-2024 04:36 AM - edited 11-08-2024 04:38 AM
Is it possible, yes. Will it work correctly, not without some additional configuration.
Others have explained using virtual link or not having the separate remote area
Other possible options would be to use tunnels and/or a separate VLAN, to either extend the remote area to an ABR, or extend area zero to that area.
11-08-2024 11:19 PM
All non-backbone area's in OSPF need to be connected to the backbone area (database exchange). as others explained you can use virtual link considering it's a temporary solotion (DNA flag on LSA, dependency on transit area, ......)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide