05-01-2019 04:28 PM - last edited on 05-30-2023 02:20 AM by Translator
R1 Configuration:
R1#sh run | s r e
ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.1.12.2
|
R2 Configuration:
R2#sh run | s r o router ospf 10 network 10.1.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 |
R3 configuration:
R3#sh run | s r e |
Output from R3:
R3#sh ip route | b Ga |
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-01-2019 07:01 PM - last edited on 05-30-2023 02:33 AM by Translator
Hi @shehab320
The OSPF external route will not be installed because of the following reason. If you look at the
show ip ospf database external 2.2.2.2
on R3 you will see that the forwarding address is chosen as 10.1.12.2.
R3 sees 10.1.12.0/24 is as an EIGRP internal route with AD90. OSPF external route requires that if the forwarding address on the type 5 LSA is non-zero then it should have a route to it learned via OSPF intra or inter area. You will argue that OSPF does have a route to it, but because EIGRP AD 90 is preferred over OSPF 110, OSPF route is not preferred for the forwarding address. So the parent type 5 route is not installed in the routing table.
Please rate this post and mark as resolved if you find this helpful.
-
Sebastian
05-01-2019 04:53 PM - last edited on 05-30-2023 02:30 AM by Translator
Hi,
Please run
clear ip eigrp 10 neig
and check again. If you still get the same result, please share the output of
show ip ospf database external
.
HTH,
Meheretab
05-01-2019 07:01 PM - last edited on 05-30-2023 02:33 AM by Translator
Hi @shehab320
The OSPF external route will not be installed because of the following reason. If you look at the
show ip ospf database external 2.2.2.2
on R3 you will see that the forwarding address is chosen as 10.1.12.2.
R3 sees 10.1.12.0/24 is as an EIGRP internal route with AD90. OSPF external route requires that if the forwarding address on the type 5 LSA is non-zero then it should have a route to it learned via OSPF intra or inter area. You will argue that OSPF does have a route to it, but because EIGRP AD 90 is preferred over OSPF 110, OSPF route is not preferred for the forwarding address. So the parent type 5 route is not installed in the routing table.
Please rate this post and mark as resolved if you find this helpful.
-
Sebastian
05-02-2019 02:53 AM
Thanks Sebastian, got it
Shehab
05-18-2023 07:00 PM - last edited on 05-30-2023 02:36 AM by Translator
Hi shehab320
> EIGRP AD 90 is preferred over OSPF 110
I think the received route is EIGRP External so AD is 170, Comparing them OSPF 110 preferd over EIGRP AD 170 right?
Do you think the routing AD preference is same specification between legacy IOS and IOS-XE?
(For example Cat35/37/ISR-G2 and ISR1K/4K/Cat9K etc..)
Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide