01-07-2024 07:46 PM - edited 01-07-2024 08:05 PM
Hi,
We have spare router, as per management decision we have to use it as VPN router. Can you please help me where we can fit this in our topology. We want to place it between Core router (ISR-4331) and Core Firewall (FTD-2130) and Core router is currently connected to ISP. How we can make it work (Routing) or any other suggestion?
01-07-2024 11:39 PM
VPN meaning
Site to Site
or
Remote Access
MHM
01-08-2024 01:10 AM
Only For Remote-Access
01-08-2024 12:01 AM
What Core Router is this ? do you have any Additional Interface on that Router - so i suggest to connect as below :
On the Core Router you can do NAT ( or if you have more Public IP address you can use).
01-08-2024 01:10 AM - edited 01-08-2024 01:14 AM
Thanks. In this case, for VPN router one-leg should be connected to Core Router and other to Core Firewall right?
01-08-2024 02:04 PM
Personally you do not required to have dual legs, you can use single leg connection to achieve that for RA VPN.
but if you have more ports available you can also achieve both models
Router required throughput license - base is only limited to certain check the documents.
01-08-2024 01:22 AM
Yes NAT is happening on Core Router. Should we place like below?
01-08-2024 01:31 AM
01-08-2024 02:19 AM
Thanks. Can you please guide us how we can ensure routing part and VPN part to make this thing working?
01-08-2024 02:56 AM
for VPN part I dont know what you meaning.
you use router as VPN RA so what is RA you meaning ?
for routing
the VPN Pool subnet config in VPN router
in FTD config route to VPN subnet toward the VPN router
in VPN router config default toward the Edge route
in VPN router config route for internal subnet toward FTD
MHM
01-08-2024 01:38 AM
The proposed solution is my personal favorite if there is already a redundant setup. But if not, you need two ports on the Core router, which is often unavailable. Adding a switch just for this purpose adds another single point of failure. In this case, I would place the router one-armed or two-armed directly on the firewall.
But as you mention remote-assess VPN, I would rethinking this approach as the the FTD is much more powerful than the ISR when it comes to RA-VPN.
01-08-2024 02:01 AM
But for this FTD, it does not have VPN license
01-08-2024 02:33 AM
Then it is more than likely that you don't have a valid Cisco Secure Client License at all. You need this regardless of the VPN platform.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide