Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you just trying to manage the whole Etherchannel as a single interface, manage each subinterface, individually, with some allocated proportion of bandwidth per subinterface or trying to manage individual Etherchannel links?
BTW, managing per Etherchannel link, would be rather unusual.
Managing subinterfaces can be difficult for making effective QoS unless you set aside a fixed proportion of bandwidth for the exclusive, and also always available, use of each subinterface.
For example, you have:
class cm-class-multimedia5
priority percent 33
and you mention having about 10 subinterfaces. So, is the 33% for all 10 subinterfaces using this kind of traffic, or 33% of each subinterface's allocated bandwidth?
Also BTW, since you're using FQ in many of your classes, you might have twice (or more) classes than you really need.
Often I suggest starting with a CBWFQ model based on:
policy-map model
class real-time !for traffic like VoIP (bearer)
priority percent 35
class foreground
bandwidth remaining percent 81 !light bandwidth usage traffic that really, really needs priorization
fair-queue
class background
bandwidth remaining percent 1 !high bandwidth, low prioity traffic, that is "happy" with left over bandwidth
fair-queue
class class-default !most non-real-time traffic goes here - it's FQ which, often, negates much need for other classes than RT
bandwidth remaining percent 9
fair-queue
