05-15-2013 04:56 AM - edited 03-04-2019 07:54 PM
Hi guys,
would it be ok to change the default max reserved band for a WAN interface which has up to 100Mbps guaranteed bandwidth?
The router is doing NAT, basic firewalling, site2site vpn (1xTunnel), QoS for VPN traffic and it has only a default route to the ISP. The ISP provides a 100Mbps connection.
The question is: does it make sense to leave the default max reserverd band on the WAN interface in this scenario, isnt't too much bandwidth left for the overhead traffic or can it be changed to 85/90 without damaging the control traffic?
Thanks.
Best regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-15-2013 06:28 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
In case my other posting isn't clear . . .
Does it make sense to leave 25Mb for the overhead traffic?
As this bandwidth is available to your other classes, unless it's being completely used, how would leaving it as the default be adverse to your other traffic? If there's a reason why it would be adverse, then you'll want to adjust.
05-15-2013 05:57 AM
Hello,
BW percentages that total 100%.including the class class-deafult can be configured with CBWFQ
Do you think 75mb is enough for your defined classes? ( default 75% ma reserverd BW)
The scheduler ensures that each queue receives % of bw defined in its class, and If some queues do not need their bw for a short period, then this is spread accross the other classes.
res
Paul
Please don't forget to rate any posts that have been helpful.
Thanks.
05-15-2013 06:11 AM
Hi Paul,
thanks for the reply.
75Mb would be ok.
But I was wondering if the max reserved band in my scenario could be changed and benefit from another 10/15Mb. I think 25Mb is quite a lot for the overhead traffic (I'm not using routing protocols).
so what's left? probably L2 traffic...
Does it make sense to leave 25Mb for the overhead traffic?
Thanks.
Best regards
05-15-2013 06:28 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
In case my other posting isn't clear . . .
Does it make sense to leave 25Mb for the overhead traffic?
As this bandwidth is available to your other classes, unless it's being completely used, how would leaving it as the default be adverse to your other traffic? If there's a reason why it would be adverse, then you'll want to adjust.
05-15-2013 06:22 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
As CBWFQ classes generally can use unused bandwidths from other classes, class bandwidth allocations are really only important when multiple classes are competing for limited bandwidth and you want to provide some classes of traffic more of the constrained bandwidth than other classes.
Whether an insufficient allocation for control traffic will be damaging, depends on the service requirements of that particular control traffic.
Generally as control traffic doesn't use much bandwidth, but might be adversely impacted by insufficient bandwidth, it's "safer" to over allocate for it, which guarantees it bandwidth when it needs it, yet other traffic can use the bandwidth allocated to its class when it's not using it.
In other words, will there be real benefit to change max reserve? (Often there's not.)
05-15-2013 06:33 AM
Hi Joseph,
thanks for clearing it up.
I thought the 25M band would be reserved and not used for the other classes..
In this case no need to change it.
Thanks.
Best
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide