QoS Shaping Subinterface

[tpfrankli]

This may not even be possible but figured I'd ping a few other brains. We are in the process of setting multiple sub-interfaces out to branch offices off our own transport. Part of this is providing them committed sub-rate interface speeds. Easy enough with an MQC shaping policy. However here's the gotcha we'd like if other sub-interfaces on the PHY aren't in use to allow the site to burst. I'm wondering if this kind of dynamic sharper is possible.


policy-map Ring-Traffic
class Voice
priority percent 30
class Signal
priority percent 5
class class-default
random-detect
!
policy-map Shape-DATX
class class-default
bandwidth 60000
shape average 60000000
service-policy Ring-Traffic
!
policy-map Shape-CRCO
class class-default
bandwidth 20000
shape average 20000000
service-policy Ring-Traffic
!
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1
no ip address
speed auto
duplex auto
negotiation auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1.39
description CRCO
encapsulation dot1Q 39
ip address 10.39.39.1 255.255.255.252
service-policy output Shape-CRCO
!
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1.40
description DATX
encapsulation dot1Q 40
ip address 10.40.40.1 255.255.255.252
service-policy output Shape-DATX


So in the above example if Gi3/0/1.40 had zero traffic Gi3/0/1.39 should be able to take all of it's 60Mbps. Basically dynamic load sharing. Not sure if this is even possible with QoS MQC. Curious as to others thoughts.

Thanks.

[Joseph W. Doherty]

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Not that I'm aware of.