07-11-2012 01:03 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:56 PM
Two isp for point to point link etherchannel concept
Isp 1 has auto neigiotation seetings
Isp2 2 has full duplex and speed 100
Does this creates problem for etherchannel
Thus both isp should have same seetings such as auto
I am geeting suspended error for etherchannel
07-11-2012 01:22 AM
Hello Prashant,
already answered in another thread in LAN forum
yes it can cause problems as the speed and duplex settings are not identical even if both are 100 full one is the result of negotiation and one is manually set
You have to make both links identical also for speed and duplex and you have to contact ISP tech stuff to see how to to do it.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
07-12-2012 01:31 AM
Please find attachement of my config
07-19-2012 10:55 AM
Hi Giuseppe
I am successfuly in bundling the link.But not able to obtain redudancy particular with one link only.
As I told you there are two links eg isp1 and isp2.
If isp1 goes down there is no problem.
If isp2 goes down than entire concetivity will be lost ?
Please suggest.
Please suggest
07-19-2012 11:51 AM
Hello Prashant,
may you post the following:
a) with both link operational
show etherchannel N detail
from both switches where N is the port channel number
b) with only one link operational (ISP2 down)
show etherchannel N detail
from both switches where N is the port channel number
You have to check if both links are operational on both sides according to switches
Hope to help
Giuseppe
07-19-2012 08:26 PM
interface GigabitEthernet1/32
no ip address
channel-group 77 mode on
end
nihilent01#show running-config int gi2/32
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 112 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/32
description "p2p airtel 10 Mbps"
no ip address
channel-group 77 mode on
end
interface Port-channel77
ip address 192.168.2.52 255.255.255.0
77 Po77(RU) - Gi1/32(P) Gi2/32(P)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
on site 2
47 Po47(RU) - Gi1/0/39(P) Gi2/0/39(P)
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/39
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 47 mode on
end
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/39
description " p2p airtel 10mbps"
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 47 mode on
end
interface Port-channel47
no switchport
ip address 192.168.2.51 255.255.255.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Port-channel: Po77
------------
Age of the Port-channel = 16d:17h:50m:40s
Logical slot/port = 14/26 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00000000 HotStandBy port = null
Passive port list = Gi1/32 Gi2/32
Port state = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse
Protocol = -
Fast-switchover = disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 55 Gi1/32 On 4
1 AA Gi2/32 On 4
Time since last port bundled: 0d:14h:35m:40s Gi2/32
Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:14h:36m:07s Gi2/32
Port-channel: Po47
------------
Age of the Port-channel = 1d:00h:07m:28s
Logical slot/port = 10/47 Number of ports = 2
GC = 0x00000000 HotStandBy port = null
Passive port list = Gi1/0/39 Gi2/0/39
Port state = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse
Protocol = -
Port security = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Gi1/0/39 On 0
0 00 Gi2/0/39 On 0
Time since last port bundled: 0d:23h:21m:24s Gi2/0/39
Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:23h:25m:34s Gi1/0/39
07-22-2012 07:54 AM
Hi Giuseppe ,
Today I observed a strange behaviour.
On site when 1shut down the interface gi1/32 than from site 1 i was not able to ping site2 end servers(from site 2 i didnot shutdown gi1/0/32)
But when from site 2 i was able to ping site 1 servers.strange
Than i decided to shutdown the interface gi1/32 from site 1 and gi1/0/39 from site 2 than both side were able to access the servers.And also the data was getting replicated through others isp link.Failover is taking place.
Than question
As I have two links with 20 Mbps each so tottaly 40 MBPs.
Is it possible to load balance 20mbps data on each link.As this is L3 etherchannel how can i achieve this.
07-23-2012 09:10 AM
Hello Prashant,
without a control protocol like LACP you can face issues like the one you have described.
I know that you have already tried to use LACP with no success. I would suggest you to try again.
Load balancing will be based on IP source address EXOR IP destination address
Hope to help
Giuseppe
07-28-2012 11:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your guidance.
Not able to bundle using lacp.
can u explain load statement. On one side it indicates load as 55 and AA.
And one side it indicate 00
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 55 Gi1/32 On 4
1 AA Gi2/32 On 4
I
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
0 00 Gi1/0/39 On 0
0 00 Gi2/0/39 On 0
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide