- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:28 PM - edited 03-05-2019 03:48 AM
Hello All -
First off I want to say thank you to everyone helping out, this is a great community from what I've seen thus far. All my google searches bring me here :)
So I built my lab, trying to study for my CCNA and for some reason, perhaps I'm over-analyzing, but I cannot wrap my head around this. The topology is attached (JPEG) and I've labeled mostly everything. When I assign an ip / subnet between 2 routers, who gets the .1 and who gets the .2? Does it matter?
Like I said, I could be over-thinking this.. either that or I've just been up way too long. Any help is greatly appreciated guys/gals, thank you very much. Please let me know if I've left out any pertinent information and I'll be glad to fill in the blanks.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Routing Protocols
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:41 PM
Hi,
When I assign an ip / subnet between 2 routers, who gets the .1 and who gets the .2? Does it matter?
It does not matter. Usually if you are doing this in a large environment and you have many routers/switches with /30 subnets you want to adopt an schema for yourself, so it is easy to remember.
For example; some providers always assign the lower number to their own interface and the higher number goes to the customer router. Other than this it really does not matter.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:41 PM
Hi,
When I assign an ip / subnet between 2 routers, who gets the .1 and who gets the .2? Does it matter?
It does not matter. Usually if you are doing this in a large environment and you have many routers/switches with /30 subnets you want to adopt an schema for yourself, so it is easy to remember.
For example; some providers always assign the lower number to their own interface and the higher number goes to the customer router. Other than this it really does not matter.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:51 PM
Reza -
Thanks so much for your response, makes sense!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 08:01 PM
Glad to help and thanks for the rating!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:42 PM
Hi,
On a point to point connection it does not matter which interface gets the ip address .1 or .2. but I should mention also that your subnetting is inefficient. Point to Point connections typically have a subnet mask of /30 which allows only 2 usable hosts.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:49 PM
Gotcha, so I'd just go to each interface and assign a /30 to each I would assume.
I'm still drilling subnetting hard so I'm still not best at it.
I appreciate your prompt response, thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 07:54 PM
Yes you can assign /30 only for the point to point. If you want you can reupload your jpg and I can verify your subnetting.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-14-2016 08:01 PM
Awesome thanks kwbrefo! I'm gonna catch some z's right now but I will do this first thing in the morning!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-16-2016 08:43 AM
Here's the new topology. Basically I changed all subnets to /30's instead of /24's
