cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
860
Views
1
Helpful
8
Replies

Two different default routes with different destination are possible?

R Manjunatha
Level 3
Level 3

Hello,

I configured the CE-6 router with two different default static routes with different destinations and I could not be able to reach one of the destinations when I used multiple static routes. which routing policy do I need to use to reach both destinations?

RManjunatha_0-1694073373925.png

 

 

CE-6#ping 10.10.10.10
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.10.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
U.U.U
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
CE-6#ping 70.70.70.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 70.70.70.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/2 ms
CE-6#sh run | se ip route
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.59.59.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1 2
2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

julijime
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi @R Manjunatha ,

Based on your configuration, the default route being installed in the routing table is the

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.59.59.1

, if this path does not have reachability to the

10.10.10.10 address

the

ping

is expected to fail. 

If the path that has reachability to the

10.10.10.10 address

is via

172.16.2.1

next hop, you can add a more specific static route such as

ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.16.2.1

 to overcome this issue.

If the path through 

59.59.59.1

next hop does not have reachability to the

10.10.10.10

this can keep failing even if you set the metric equal for both default routes.

HTH,

Julio 

View solution in original post

ip route 70.70.70.2 255.255.255.255 59.59.59.1
ip route 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 172.16.2.1

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8

julijime
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi @R Manjunatha ,

Based on your configuration, the default route being installed in the routing table is the

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.59.59.1

, if this path does not have reachability to the

10.10.10.10 address

the

ping

is expected to fail. 

If the path that has reachability to the

10.10.10.10 address

is via

172.16.2.1

next hop, you can add a more specific static route such as

ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.16.2.1

 to overcome this issue.

If the path through 

59.59.59.1

next hop does not have reachability to the

10.10.10.10

this can keep failing even if you set the metric equal for both default routes.

HTH,

Julio 

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

For fun, try a traceroute to each destination.

Yes. a specific static route will resolve this problem. if I need to use a route map. What will be the configuration in this scenario?

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.59.59.1 - destination ip 70.70.70.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1 -destination ip 10.10.10.10


ip route 70.70.70.2 255.255.255.255 59.59.59.1
ip route 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255 172.16.2.1

Okay, there is another option I believe PBR. Anyway, thanks for the update.


@R Manjunatha wrote:

Okay, there is another option I believe PBR. Anyway, thanks for the update.


Perhaps.  Cannot say for sure.  PBR selects routes based on source information rather than destination information.

Thats true. Thank you for the update. 

guruvignesh
Level 1
Level 1

Hello, Manjunatha

You should configure a

default gateway

with a higher administrative distance for the route you want to use as a backup. This way, if the primary route becomes unavailable, the router will automatically switch to the backup route.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card