cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
330
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Two ISP, 1 network and 4 remote network(MPLS)

jeanmichel2710
Level 1
Level 1

First of all greetings and hoping someone can help me.

The problem that I have is: I have a Cisco 2911 Router and I need to split the traffic from my Lan (Gi0 / 0) by ISP1 (fa0 / 0) and that of my servers (Gi/0/0) by ISP2 (fa0 / 1). this was achieved with the following confg ..

int fa 0/0/0 (Inter)

ip nat outside

int fa 0/0/1 (CANTV)

ip nat outside

int gi 0/0 (Lan)

ip nat inside

ip policy route-map PBR

ip access-list standard 10 (out CANTV)

permit host 192.168.0.99

permit host 192.168.0.94

ip access-list standard 20 (Exit Inter)

permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.1.255

ip nat inside source list 10 interface fa 0/0/1 overload

ip nat inside source list 20 interface fa 0/0/0 overload

route-map PBR permit 10

match ip address CANTV

set ip next-hop fa 0/0/1

route-map PBR permit 20

match ip address INTERCABLE

set ip next-hop fa 0/0/0

ip access-list extended CANTV

permit ip any host 192.168.0.99

permit ip any host 192.168.0.94

ip access-list extended INTERCABLE

permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.1.255 any

My problem comes when wanting to communicate with my remote networks that reach the int Gi 0/1, because when my network to match the policy-route internet sends me all the way.

You can give a solution to this or another configuration?

Thanks and Regards

1 Reply 1

Dennis Mink
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Why dont you use NAT to do it?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080950834.shtml

please note that using NAT will not give you any form of redundancy

=============================
Please remember to rate useful posts, by clicking on the stars below. 

=============================

Please remember to rate useful posts, by clicking on the stars below.