SNAsw with x.25 and PVC

[bjr]

Hi.

We are trying to get rid of 3745 FEP's and use SNAswitch instead. We have a couple of old X.25 coming in and SVC's are OK. But we have a problem with PVc's. Anyone tried and got it working??

Bjorn

[drolemc]

What is the problem that you are facing with the PVC's. Is the connectivity not happening and if so what is the error message that you are getting..

[bjr]

We would like a good definition of how to define this in SNAsw. We have so far not found anything. And when we try with an X.25 with both PVC's ans SVC's we just get the SVC's working. The X.25 works just fine in the 3745 NCP.

Regards

Bjorn

[mbinzer]

Hi,

i am not sure if this helps. This is from a lab a coworker of mine once did.

!

source-bridge ring-group 4095

dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.48.64.19

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.48.64.75

!

interface Ethernet0

ip address 10.48.64.19 255.255.255.0

!

interface Serial1

encapsulation x25 ietf

x25 address 1111

x25 pvc 1 qllc 2222

qllc dlsw pvc 1 vmacaddr 4000.4500.4500 partner 4000.4500.1111

!

snasw cpname NETA.GRAWN

snasw port VDLC vdlc 4095 mac 4000.4500.1111 conntype nohpr

snasw port HPRIP hpr-ip Ethernet0

snasw link NHOST port HPRIP ip-dest 10.48.64.243

grawn#sh snas li

Number of links 2

SNA Links HPR

Link Name State Port Name Adjacent CP Name Node Type Sess Sup

--------- -------- --------- ---------------- ------------ ---- ---

1> @I000001 Active VDLC NETA.ABC LEN Node 2 No

2> NHOST Active HPRIP NETA.CPDEREK Network Node 0 Yes

grawn#sh snas dlus

Number of Dependent LU Servers 1

SNA Dependent LU Servers

DLUS Name Default? Backup? Pipe State PUs

----------------- -------- ------- ---------------- -------

1> NETA.CPDEREK Yes No Active 1

This example is using a x25 pvc and it worked fine.

thanks...

Matthias

[bjr]

Thanx!

It looks a bit different than we tried. Unfortunatly the customers do not like that we try it right away. I will let you know if it works.

Regards

Bjorn

[bjr]

Thanks!

We got it!

Regards

Bjorn