Server Networking

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Cisco UCS X-Series Energy Efficiency Offer

 

Forum Posts

It is mentionned in the Datasheet that the supervisor 32, support line card using the shared bus and CEF256. But further in the doc we see that this sup does only have the shared bus. Does tha mean that CEF256 card are support only with the shared bu...

cebetant by Level 1
  • 488 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

The 7513 with 12.1.3 IOS , the CIP microcode is 27-9.What cause the following messages?I think it is a bug, but I can't found any bugs by bugs tools:May 17 15:00:22: %DBUS-3-DBUSINTERR: Slot 10, Internal ErrorMay 17 15:00:44: %RSP-3-RESTART: cbus com...

Currently remote 9371 (PU5 old IBM mini-mainframe) traffic is encapsulated via STUN which is then de-encapsulated at the data center STUN router and traffic is then forwarded to the 3745 FEP. The 3745 FEP will be eliminated next year and would like t...

Hello Forum,this is actually a design issue and I just want a second opinion on this. We have about 40 branches that connect to the Mainframe through 3745(FEP) by ODLC (x25) lines. There are no SNI links, only subarea. We are thinking of getting rid ...

Hi. We are trying to get rid of 3745 FEP's and use SNAswitch instead. We have a couple of old X.25 coming in and SVC's are OK. But we have a problem with PVc's. Anyone tried and got it working??Bjorn

bjr by Level 1
  • 710 Views
  • 5 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hi all,this is related to discussion:http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Network%20Infrastructure&topic=LAN%2C%20Switching%20and%20Routing&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd82da4I opened this new one s...

If a group of production switches are configured as a cluster, is it necessary to touch each switch to move from PVST to Rapid Spanning Tree, or will the Cluster Commander propogate the change out to the member switches?

dan by Level 1
  • 426 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

The particular error in question that was showing in the log of the 6509 switch on module 6 for example: May 4 16:58:25: %PM_SCP-SP-6-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 6 is experiencing the following error: LTL Parity error detected on Coil #0. May 4 16:58:2...

We have configure 18 internal adapter with MAC address in CIP. I will need to change 9 of those to different MAC address. Since the other 9 adapter will be still on production, will I need to shut down the channel interface during the re-configuratio...

yuck by Level 1
  • 355 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes