RV345 - Max Static DHCP Table Limited to 100 Devices

[rxm]

I bought the RV345 Dual WAN product from Cisco specifically to serve an environment where we took security and address allocation seriously.  Unfortunately, I've found that the RV345 is limited to only 100 static DHCP address assignments!  Why on earth would this be the case?  Seems like a totally arbitrary number and it just made this product useless to me.

Can anyone from Cisco comment on this?  Is there any hope of increasing this to a full class C at least.?  There is no way this is a "resource limitation" of the device given the hardware components used... this is a simple software configuration.

[luis_cordova]

Hi @rxm ,

Maybe this discussion can give you some help:

https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/rv325/m-p/3842053#M313591

Regards

[junkycosmos2]

Has there been any update to the 100 limit on the RV345?

Both DHCP static device list and IP Source Guard have a 100 device limit. 

I originally posted about it here 

https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/ip-and-mac-binding-on-rv340-rv345-missing-feature/td-p/3175387 

but also found references to other users in these threads

https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/rv345-static-dhcp-table-limited-to-25-30-devices/td-p/3842083

Had been told by Cisco in 2018 that they would be updating the device limit as the old RV42G supported well over 200 IPs (or had no limit) but I have heard nothing.

[maxbit]

Unfortunately, CISCO doesn't give a s.h.i.t about the client, nothing has changed
Then there's the limit of 100 DHCP clients... which is some kind of joke from this $^#&$## CISCO company until now I saw this company as serious and this is a joke

[SamirD]

Have you adjusted the dhcp range and parameters to support more than 100 clients?  Every router I've ever touched can do .2-.254 on a class C.