I fail to see the issue in the info you provided. The transceiver details shows a 16Gb SFP is plugged into fc2/15 with details stating an OM3 cable provides up to 100m distance.
The Cisco specs you provide shows 14.025Gbs baud rate (which is generated by a 16Gbs SFP) is also 100m distance for OM3 cable, the same qualifications are listed in show transceiver details. For a given SFP type (16Gb v. 32Gb) OM4 will provide a bit maximum longer distance vs. OM3.
The question is how long is your cable run? If it's under 70m (231ft) then OM3 should work just as well as OM4 for 32Gb SFP . Or if using 16Gb SFP and if distance is under 100m then OM3 will also work. From what I've read OM3 provides same level of performance as OM4 but at a reduced distance and costs less per cable.
Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS9E1 Follow us: https://twitter.com/ciscochampions
Join us for an informal discussion on why enterprise microservices architectures rely on open source service mesh, such as Istio, to secure, connect, obser...
From Vsphere Version 6.6 onwards Basic LACP is not supported, this post is to go through the steps required for the Enhanced LACP configuration when using VMM integration with ACI.
To configure Enhanced LACP please make su...
Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS8E50Follow us: https://twitter.com/ciscochampion Demystify your hybrid cloud network automation and operations. With its “one-view” presentation of all your hybrid cloud network sites, Cisco Nexus Dashboard enables IT opera...
※この はじめての Intersight Workload Optimizer / How To "Community" サイトで公開させていただいている情報は、Intersight Workload Optimizer に関わるナレッジを共有させて頂くことを目的としております。なるべく情報の正確性には努めてはおりますが、本 Community サイトで公開させて頂いている情報に基づいておこなわれた構成その他あらゆる設定に関してシスコとして一切の責任を持つことはできませんので、必ず公式なドキュメント、ガ...