Difference between SG200 and SG220

[optvision1]

1) Can someone please tell me the difference between the SG200 and SG220 series switches?  I was assuming that the SG220 was a newer version, but I see that the SG200 is still listed on the website and is being sold by various vendors.  2) Would the recommendation be to purchase the 220 series, if that is the latest version?  3) Can the SFP  ports be used as normal network ports for possibly connecting to a wireless router, etc.? Thanks!

[V K Moorthy]

Hi,

SG220 is the advance switch compare with SG200 switch.

Many added options are in SG220:

1.CLI supported

2.Telnet

3.SSL

4.MSTP

for more details see the below datasheets:

SG220:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/small-business-220-series-smart-plus-switches/datasheet-c78-731284.html

SG200:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/small-business-100-series-unmanaged-switches/data_sheet_c78-634369.html

regards

Moorthy

[c.heutger]

Sorry, but I don't agree. I just change from SG200 to SG220. SG220 has less options, less information in the GUI, I can't install my own ssl certificate (with CLI I just can generate a new self-signed one), no german language file. Only reasons for me to move: Less power consumption, less size.

And no timeserver unicast with two timeservers.