01-24-2013 04:32 AM
Good day! I have a promlem configuring GVRP on SGE2000. The problem can be described as following: when I configured port no 1 (used as uplink) as trunk with GVRP enabled, all VLANs were transferred to the switch succsessfuly and also were added as a member (allowed vlan) to this port. But when I configured a couple more trunk ports, VLANs weren't included into members for these ports. I have to add allowed VLAN manually. GVRP on these problem trunk ports is enabled and transfers all VLANs well to switches connected to them. Am I missed somehing?
SW ver: 3.0.2.0 ( date 07-Nov-2011 time 15:35:17 )
Config:
interface range ethernet g(1,11,20-24)
switchport mode trunk
exit
vlan database
vlan 7,20-21
exit
interface range ethernet g(1,11,20-24)
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 7
exit
interface range ethernet g(11,20-24)
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 20
exit
interface range ethernet g(1,11,20-24)
gvrp enable
exit
gvrp enable
01-24-2013 05:14 AM
Hi Nikolai, what are you connecting to those other ports? If you're connecting computers or something, GVRP won't work unless those devices have network cards that support GVRP.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
01-24-2013 09:55 PM
I connetcted to these problem ports other swithces, of course To tell more, they recieve all GVRP data they should recieve and add all recieved VLANs as members of their trunk ports. But... On master switch, SGE2000. these trunk ports still don't have as members those VLANs which are being transmitted to connected switches.
Where am I wrong?
01-24-2013 11:45 PM
I also discovered that such behavior can be observed on other small business switches too (SG300). And I also found that GVRP registers dynamics VLANs as members ONLY on one uplink port, i.e. on port which leads to rest part of the network. Maybe this is normal GVRP behavior?
01-25-2013 03:28 AM
Hi Nikolai, the GVRP database behaves 'in order' of last update. Lets say you have 1 master switch with 2 switches hanging off of it. Link 1 has 1u,2t,3t,4t. Link 2 is equal, 1u,2t,3t,4t. If you modify link 2 in any way, link 1 is also modified (drops all trunk/tag).
I'll be honest, GVRP is a pretty bad protocol. The switches are behaving as expected.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide