cancel
Showing results forĀ 
Search instead forĀ 
Did you mean:Ā 
cancel
4936
Views
0
Helpful
11
Replies

2811 Static Routing setup

arthurtw_wang
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Sirs

My draft architecture

PC1(192.168.11.2/24)<=>F0/1(192.168.11.1/24)(2811R1)F0/0(192.168.1.1/24)<=>F0/0(192.168.1.2/24)(2811R2)F0/1(192.168.13.1/24)<=>PC2(192.168.13.2/24)

config Static routing 

2811R1: ip route 192.168.13.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2

2811R2: ip route 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1

PC1 can ping 192.168.13.1 successfully , but can not approch PC2(192.168.13.2)

otherwise PC2(192.168.13.2) can ping 192.168.11.1 succefully , but can not approch PC1(192.168.11.2) successfully

Have any problem to config static router commands? Thanks in advance

BTW PS. I use Cisco Packet Tracer for the simulation . PC1/PC2 can ping each other successfully

 

11 Replies 11

Hello,

post the Packet Tracer file (zip it first otherwise you cannot upload it).

Basically, a static default route on both routers should be sufficient:

2811R1: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2

2811R2: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1

Hello,

here is a working .pkt. Compare this with what you have, you might be missing something simple...

hi Georg

thanks for kind..

My running-config

2811R1#sh ru

*Jul 13 08:09:03.422: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consolen

Building configuration...

 

 

Current configuration : 1052 bytes

!

! Last configuration change at 08:09:03 UTC Thu Jul 13 2017

!

version 15.1

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

!

hostname 2811R1

!

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

!

enable secret 5 $1$vx/.$ohsikXh6myLyn8To38a1r.

enable password admin

!

no aaa new-model

!

!

dot11 syslog

ip source-route

!

!

ip cef

!

!

no ipv6 cef

!

multilink bundle-name authenticated

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

voice-card 0

!

!

!

!

!

license udi pid CISCO2811 sn FHK1337F2VA

!

redundancy

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/0

 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

 duplex half

 speed auto

 no mop enabled

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

 ip address 192.168.11.1 255.255.255.0

 duplex auto

 speed auto

!

ip forward-protocol nd

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

!

!

ip route 192.168.13.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2

!

!

!

!

!

snmp-server community public RO

!

!

control-plane

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

line con 0

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

 password cisco

 login

 transport input all

!

scheduler allocate 20000 1000

end

 

 

2811R2#sh run

Building configuration...

 

 

Current configuration : 1052 bytes

!

! Last configuration change at 08:22:25 UTC Thu Jul 13 2017

!

version 15.1

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

!

hostname 2811R2

!

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

!

enable secret 5 $1$eWCB$QdeUBfmUR080l.PdCv4zS0

enable password admin

!

no aaa new-model

!

!

dot11 syslog

ip source-route

!

!

ip cef

!

!

no ipv6 cef

!

multilink bundle-name authenticated

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

voice-card 0

!

!

!

!

!

license udi pid CISCO2811 sn FHK1338F1HD

!

redundancy

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/0

 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0

 duplex half

 speed auto

 no mop enabled

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

 ip address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0

 duplex auto

 speed auto

!

ip forward-protocol nd

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

!

!

ip route 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1

!

!

!

!

!

snmp-server community public RO

!

!

control-plane

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

line con 0

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

 password cisco

 login

 transport input all

!

scheduler allocate 20000 1000

end

 

2811R2#

2811R2#

Hello,

the router configuration is identical to the one I sent you, so that looks good. What is the output of 'ipconfig' from both connected PCs ? It should look like this:

PC1

C:\>ipconfig

FastEthernet0 Connection:(default port)

Link-local IPv6 Address.........: FE80::205:5EFF:FE83:126C
IP Address......................: 192.168.11.2
Subnet Mask.....................: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway.................: 192.168.11.1

PC2

C:\>ipconfig

FastEthernet0 Connection:(default port)

Link-local IPv6 Address.........: FE80::205:5EFF:FE83:126C
IP Address......................: 192.168.13.2
Subnet Mask.....................: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway.................: 192.168.13.1

yes

PC1

連ē·šē‰¹å®š DNS å°¾ē¢¼ . . . . . . . . :
連ēµ-ęœ¬ę©Ÿ IPv6 位址 . . . . . . . : fe80::644f:d131:2600:9503%38
IPv4 位址 . . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.11.2
子ē¶²č·Æ遮ē½© . . . . . . . . . . . .: 255.255.255.0
預čح閘道 . . . . . . . . . . . . .: 192.168.11.1

PC2

連ēµ-ęœ¬ę©Ÿ IPv6 位址 . . . . . . . : fe80::a4d9:73f:5230:e8f8%11

   IPv4 位址 . . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.13.2

   子ē¶²č·Æ遮ē½© . . . . . . . . . . . .: 255.255.255.0

   預čح閘道 . . . . . . . . . . . . .: 192.168.13.1

the same  you wrote..

Upload the zipped .pkt file, this should work. Did you compare the one I sent to what you have ?

yes..As I said, I use Cisco Packet tracker and the pkt you sent me , They are both workable, But so strange, When I setup the running-config  file as above , PC1 and PC2 can not ping each other successfully.

Hello

PC1 can ping 192.168.13.1 successfully , but can not approch PC2(192.168.13.2)

PC2(192.168.13.2) can ping 192.168.11.1 succefully , but can not approch PC1(192.168.11.2) successfully

. PC1/PC2 can ping each other successfully

Seems like your routing is fine, so what do you mean by can not approch PC1 /2 ?

res
Paul


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the communityā€™s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

it means that PC1 ping PC2 (or PC2 ping PC1) unsuccessfully...

Hello

do the pics have any software fw enabled -which will prohibit echo-reply

res

paul


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the communityā€™s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card