03-10-2018 09:54 AM - edited 03-08-2019 02:12 PM
Hello everybody,
I have a question regarding the 6800 architecture design and that is whether the CAM table size of 128k is per line card or per chassis? The linecards are considered to be using DFC module.
Regards,
Hesam
03-10-2018 12:54 PM
Hi,
The CAM table or the MAC address table is 128k per chassis. That number is supported in sup 2T.
HTH
03-10-2018 01:30 PM - edited 03-10-2018 01:33 PM
Thanks for your reply, but look at the following paragraph in "Cisco Catalyst 6500 Supervisor Engine 2T - Layer 2 Scalability Enhancements White Paper":
"Figure 1 describes the Layer 2 forwarding operation of the Policy Feature Card 4 (PFC4) on the Supervisor Engine 2T. This operation also applies to any Distributed Forwarding Card 4 (DFC4) equipped line cards.
The biggest change occurred from PFC2 to PFC3, when the MAC address table was moved from a standalone chip on the PFC2 into the Layer 2 forwarding chip on the PFC3. Over time, the size of the MAC address table has gradually increased, and just as importantly the hash efficiency has increased as well."
So from what I gather, every line card can be equipped with a separate DFC which has its own MAC table of 128K and the important point is that the FIB is copied from the supervisor to LCs not the CAM table according to Cisco documentation which we can deduct that the CAM table is separate on every LC. Correct me if I am wrong.
"The MSFC builds the Cisco Express Forwarding information Base (FIB) table in software and then downloads this table to the hardware Application-specific-integrated circuits (ASICs) on the PFC and DFC (if present) that make the forwarding decisions for IP unicast and multicast traffic."
Hash Efficiency of PFCs and DFCs for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switch
PFC4/4XL DFC4/4XL |
128K |
99% |
127K |
Regards,
Hesam
03-10-2018 10:39 PM
Hi Reza,
The reason I asked this question is that we are going to use a pair of 6807XL with SUP2T installed as VPLS hubs which are roughly going to pass 500k PPPoE sessions and so if the limitation is per the chassis we have to come up with another solution.
Regards,
Hesam
03-19-2018 02:24 AM
Hi Cisco staffs,
I am waiting for a definitive answer regarding the architecture of 6800.
Regards,
Hesam
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide