Adding the routed interface in to the dynamic routing statement

[parakiteiz]

I have a 3560 that is hooked to a 6509. The following SVI's live on the 3560:

192.168.180.1 (VLAN 180), 192.168.181.1(VLAN 181),  192.168.182.1 (VLAN 182) , 192.168.183.1 (VLAN 183) , 192.168.184.1 (VLAN 183),

I want to create the router eigrp statement that says:

router eigrp 777

network 192.168.180.0 0.0.0.225

network 192.168.181.0 0.0.0.225

network 192.168.182.0 0.0.0.225

network 192.168.183.0 0.0.0.225

network 192.168.184.0 0.0.0.225

Now for the routed interface on the 3506 which is 192.168.0.17 do I create a routing statement for the and is it as simple as network 192.168.0.17 0.0.0.3?  What about the opposite side do I add  network 192.168.0.17 0.0.0.3 in the network statement on the 6509?

[Jon Marshall]

Yes is the simple answer, you need to include a network statement for that subnet on both switches.

I have just answered another of your questions relating to the same thing and the same answer would still apply if you changed the routed link to the trunk I suggested in the other post.

Jon

[Jon Marshall]

By the way the it should be "network 192.168.16.0 0.0.0.3"

Jon

[parakiteiz]

Jon isn't that statement backwards? shouldn't it be 192.168.0.16  0.0.0.3?

Yes both of these questions are related to the same project I just get better answers if I split them up by topic.

[Jon Marshall · Accepted solution]

Jon isn't that statement backwards? shouldn't it be 192.168.0.16  0.0.0.3?

My mistake, you are right, it should be as you say.

Sorry about that :-)

Jon