I am seeing the same thing on my new ASR1002-X. The router came with 4 SFP-GE-T EXT SFP tranceivers included. I am connecting up to a 6509-E. I have tried 3 different CAT6 cables new out of the bag, tried all available SFP slots on the front of the chassis, tried a known good GLC-T, tried setting speed and duplex on both sides of the connection, different line cards in the 6509-E, and a completely separate 6509-E, and I upgraded the IOS on the router. All with the same results.
The ASR:
ASR-1002X-router#sh int g0/0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is 6XGE-BUILT-IN, address is 10f3.119d.9600 (bia 10f3.119d.9600)
Internet address is 10.232.0.9/28
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 221/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not supported
Full Duplex, 1000Mbps, link type is force-up, media type is T
output flow-control is on, input flow-control is on
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:14:02, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:20:15
Input queue: 0/375/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 3 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
3864 packets input, 815922 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
599 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
599 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 3246 multicast, 0 pause input
881 packets output, 346328 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
ASR-1002X-router#sh run int g0/0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 217 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
ip address 10.232.0.9 255.255.255.240
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
speed 1000
no negotiation auto
end
I'm starting to wonder if this is a spurious message, but I'd like to see if Cisco can say that with confidence. I am opening a TAC case (bummer) and I'll try to update this thread with any results.
