11-09-2016 10:28 PM - edited 03-08-2019 08:06 AM
Hi guys,
I am just investigating the possibility to run BFD on a Cat650X utilizing SUP2Ts running:
s2t54-ipservicesk9-mz.SPA.151-2.SY7.bin
However, my initial testing shows its not supported, and I would like to ask the greater audience if someone got it working, or if this is generally not supported.
Running routed sub-interfaces worked for EIGRP sessions to establish, whereas BFD would not, please find the implemented config on the Cat6500 as follows:
CAT65#sh run | b 1/8/44
interface GigabitEthernet1/8/44
no switchport
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/8/44.80
encapsulation dot1Q 80
ip address 172.29.0.1 255.255.255.0
bfd interval 50 min_rx 50 multiplier 3
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/8/44.81
encapsulation dot1Q 81
ip address 172.30.0.1 255.255.255.0
bfd interval 50 min_rx 50 multiplier 3
router eigrp 250
network 172.29.0.1 0.0.0.0
network ip address 172.30.0.1 0.0.0.0
no passive-interface gi1/8/44.80
no passive-interface gi1/8/44.81
CAT65#sh ip eigrp neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(250)
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
1 172.30.0.2 Gi1/8/44.81 14 00:00:06 2 100 0 19
0 172.29.0.2 Gi1/8/44.80 12 00:00:06 2 100 0 13
CAT65#sh bfd neighbors
CAT65#
CAT65#
BFD never came up, the other side was a C2851 whereas I had previously tested BFD working on routed sub-interfaces
Thanks
Colin
11-09-2016 10:32 PM
Background of why i'm after this is to utilize VRF lite like configuration, while being able to have BFD on run on the sub-interfaces.
BFD has been implemented a bit crunchy on Cat65's by the looks, not sure if BFD IPv4 multi-hop would work on Cat65, but I try to avoid that if I can.
Probably helps understanding why i am asking it.
Thanks
Colin
11-10-2016 11:59 AM
Hi Colin,
You need to enable BFD under the routing process configuration, if it's supported for the protocol.
Try:
router eigrp 250
bfd all-interfaces
or
router eigrp 250
bfd interface GigabitEthernet1/8/44.80
bfd interface GigabitEthernet1/8/44.81
Regards,
Sigurbjartur
02-19-2017 03:47 PM
Hi Sigurbjartur,
Thanks for your answer. It worked as expected.
Quick question, what do you recommend when using BFD timers of lets say 300ms multiplier 3.
I thought of using the following, adding dampening and carrier-delay 0 into the mix, in order to avoid flapping behavior.
interface GigabitEthernet1/X
dampening
ip address 10.X.X.X 255.255.255.252
carrier-delay 0
bfd interval 300 min_rx 300 multiplier 3
THX
Colin
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide