cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
287
Views
1
Helpful
4
Replies

Can I use Auto-RP with Cisco switches and HP switches?

JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1738151359868.png

I don't know much about multicast.

Perhaps the HP switch has multicast enabled.
None of us have access to the HP switch to see the configuration.

The new video stream server and TVs will be connected to the Cisco switch.
Therefore, I need to configure multicast on the Cisco switch.

I think Auto-RP is a good technology.
If I am already using RP on HP switches, can I use Auto-RP on Cisco switches?

Any ideas?

 

4 Replies 4

M02@rt37
VIP
VIP

Hello @JustTakeTheFirstStep 

Thanks for that draw attached to your question.

If the HP switch is already using a static RP or PIM-BSR for multicast, you should match its RP configuration on the Cisco switch rather than using Auto-RP, as Auto-RP is Cisco-proprietary and may not be supported by HP.

To ensure multicast works on the Cisco switch for the video stream server and TVs, enable ip multicast-routing, configure PIM Sparse Mode on the VLAN interfaces, and either manually set the same RP as the HP switch (ip pim rp-add <rendez-vous point IP>) or use PIM-BSR if HP supports it. If multicast traffic does not need to flow between the Cisco and HP switches, you can configure Auto-RP on the Cisco switch independently by setting it as an RP (ip pim send-rp-announce and  ippim send-rp-discovery on a loopback interface), but interoperability with HP should be verified first...

 

Best regards
.ı|ı.ı|ı. If This Helps, Please Rate .ı|ı.ı|ı.

Hello
As stated BSR is non proprietary , but simple static RP is applicable based on your ASM topology, unless you that you which to have RP resiliency then use BSR would be preferable over static RP, however you could negate RP altogether by using SSM


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

C2960#sh run int vlan 192 C6500#sh run int vlan 192
interface Vlan192 interface Vlan192
 ip address 10.131.200.163 255.255.240.0  ip address 10.131.200.54 255.255.240.0
 ip pim sparse-dense-mode  ip pim sparse-dense-mode
   
#sh vlan #sh vlan
VLAN Name                             Status  VLAN Name                             Status 
---- -------------------------------- ------- ---- -------------------------------- -------
193  VLAN0193                         active     193  VLAN0193                         active    
   
SKOS_NON-SECURITY_L5_2#sh inven SKOS_NON-SECURITY_CORE#sh inven
PID: WS-C2960X-48TS-L PID: WS-C6513-E
   
SKOS_NON-SECURITY_L5_2#sh run all | i routing SKOS_NON-SECURITY_CORE#sh run all | i routing
ip multicast-routing distributed ip multicast-routing 
   
SKOS_NON-SECURITY_L5_2#sh ip route SKOS_NON-SECURITY_CORE#sh run | i pim
Default gateway is 10.131.32.1 ip pim send-rp-announce Vlan192 scope 5
  ip pim send-rp-announce Vlan176 scope 5
  ip pim send-rp-announce Vlan179 scope 5
  ip pim send-rp-discovery scope 5
   
  SKOS_NON-SECURITY_CORE#sh ip route
  Gateway of last resort is not set

@paul driver M02@rt37 

I created an SVI according to the guide to use sparse-mode.
However, I did not use “ip routing” on the switch.
Do I need to do “ip routing” to use sparse-mode on the 2960 switch?

Hello
HP/Aruba (mainly aruba) will support Static RP or BSR but it will NOT support auto-rp as that is Cisco propitiatory.


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card