I'm configuring a few stacks of 2960X's and concerning stack priority, what would be the idle way to configure this? Would it make sense to have switch priority configured for each one, only the master, or only the master and a backup master? For example, if I configured it like this I would how exactly how it would behave in case of failure of any switch:
how you have posted is absolutely fine otherwise if you only state a master and backup if both go down then and election will take place of the remainng switches - also if you need to replace a switch with the broken ones the new switch will have a default priority of 1 and will also tray to become masters and could potentiialy wipe you running config with its default config -So how you have posted is good
Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful. This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.
Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS9E25 Follow us: twitter.com/ciscochampions
With applications and users everywhere, the networks are now, more than ever, being tasked with delivering consistent protection while providing an exceptional user exper...
Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS9E24 Follow us: https://twitter.com/CiscoChampion
Cisco Radio Aware Routing addresses several of the challenges faced when merging IP routing and radio communications in mobile networks, especially those exhibiti...
Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS9E23 Follow us: https://twitter.com/CiscoChampion The Wi-Fi 6E Catalyst 9136 access point takes advantage of the 6-GHz band to produce a network that is more reliable and secure, with higher throughput, more ...
When moving from OSPFv2 to OSPFv3, there are many changes in the format of the LSAs Type, but the most known changes are: IP prefix informations are no longer carried in Type-1 LSA and Type-2 LSA, new LSAs Type 8 and 9 are added to carry these prefixes.