Configure 2 links load balancing using BGP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-31-2012 06:59 AM - edited 03-07-2019 10:50 AM
Hi,
I want a sipmle configuration regarding to configure load balancing using BGP for two links. My netwrok topology is as below.
So anyone have simple BGP load balancing configuration for this kind of network topology, please share with me .
- Labels:
-
Other Switching

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-31-2012 07:21 AM
Here you go:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800945bf.shtml#conf2
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-31-2012 07:27 AM
Hi,
I think BGP maximum-path it's solution what are looking for which by default is 1. Change to 2 then it should be ok. ISPs should be advertising default routes.
Configuration:
router bgp ZZZ
neighbor x.x.x.x remote-as 4700
neighbor y.y.y.y remote-as 4700
maximum-paths 2
Verify:
sh ip route
The link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800945bf.shtml#conf2
Hope it will help.
Abzal
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-01-2013 03:05 AM
Hi,
this will install multiple BGP routes for the same prefix in the RIB but the load-sharing will still be taken in charge by the switching process which is CEF by default and the traffic will be load shared by src-dst IP.
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-01-2013 02:28 PM
ip load-sharing per-packet
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2013 12:23 AM
Hi,
yes of course but It is highly recommend not to use per-packet load sharing.
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
