02-12-2011 12:07 PM - edited 03-06-2019 03:30 PM
I'm just labbing some MST for some CCNP practice and I noticed that my 2950 switches always think they are the root for both MST instances, when they shouldn't be the root for any. The output of the 3550s seem to make sense. One is the root for one instance and the other is the root for the other instance. I even configured pre standard on the links that go to the 2950s. Any ideas? Thanks, Pat.
2950
MST01
Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp
Root ID Priority 32769
Address 0016.c87e.2240
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32769 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 0016.c87e.2240
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/3 Boun BLK 200000 128.3 P2p Bound(RSTP)
Fa0/4 Boun FWD 200000 128.4 P2p Bound(RSTP)
MST02
Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp
Root ID Priority 32770
Address 0016.c87e.2240
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32770 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 2)
Address 0016.c87e.2240
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/3 Boun BLK 200000 128.3 P2p Bound(RSTP)
Fa0/4 Boun FWD 200000 128.4 P2p Bound(RSTP)
ALS1#
3550
MST1
Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp
Root ID Priority 1
Address 000d.65eb.3800
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 1 (priority 0 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 000d.65eb.3800
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/1 Desg FWD 200000 128.1 P2p
Fa0/3 Desg FWD 200000 128.3 P2p Pre-STD
Fa0/5 Desg FWD 200000 128.5 P2p Pre-STD-Cf
MST2
Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp
Root ID Priority 2
Address 000d.65b3.ec00
Cost 200000
Port 1 (FastEthernet0/1)
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 4098 (priority 4096 sys-id-ext 2)
Address 000d.65eb.3800
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/1 Root FWD 200000 128.1 P2p
Fa0/3 Desg FWD 200000 128.3 P2p Pre-STD
Fa0/5 Desg FWD 200000 128.5 P2p Pre-STD-Cf
DLS1#
02-12-2011 12:24 PM
Patrick,
Your 2950 believes that both Fa0/3 and Fa0/4 are boundary ports, and therefore it considers itself to be a standalone region. Quite logically, it considers itself to be a root switch in that region (a single switch in a region is always its root). Can you confirm that the configuration of the MSTP region is identical on both switches? Please use the show spanning-tree mst config digest command to verify the MD5 digests along with the region name and revision number to make sure that the switches are configured correctly for a single region operation.
Best regards,
Peter
02-12-2011 04:19 PM
Thanks, Peter. The revision number has only local significance, correct?
02-12-2011 11:28 PM
Hello Patrick,
The revision number has only local significance, correct?
No, the region revision number is a value that is carried in MSTP BPDUs and compared among MSTP switches. It must be set to an identical value on all switches in the same region. By definition, two switches are in the same MSTP region if and only if all of the following requirements are met:
Best regards,
Peter
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide