cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1916
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

Core 4506 HA and DHCP redundancy

ahmedbishry
Level 1
Level 1

Hi All,

I have a setup with two Cat 4506E working as a HA,

I used a bundle 4Gb interfaces working as ether-channel,

I'm facing a problem with DHCP pools on the both SW's,

There is no problem if I use the pools on one sw,

But when I but the pool on both sw's then I faced a lot of conflict IP in the DHCP pools,

How can setup a real DHCP redundancy on both SW's,

Thanks in advanced for your effort,

Ahmed,

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi,
You can configure different pool space to avoid DHCP conflict.
Example:

Sw1:

int vlan 15
ip addr 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
standby 15 ip 10.0.0.1

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.128 10.0.0.254

ip dhcp pool sw1
net 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.0.0.1

Sw2:

int vlan 15
ip add 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
standby 15 ip 10.0.0.1

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.4 10.0.0.127

ip dhcp pool sw2
net 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.0.0.1

Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Best regards,
Abzal

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

Reza Sharifi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi,

When you say HA, you mean VRRP, HSRP?

Dear Reza,

Many thanks for your reply,

Yes I mean HSRP,

Thanks,

Ahmed

Hi,
You can configure different pool space to avoid DHCP conflict.
Example:

Sw1:

int vlan 15
ip addr 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
standby 15 ip 10.0.0.1

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.128 10.0.0.254

ip dhcp pool sw1
net 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.0.0.1

Sw2:

int vlan 15
ip add 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
standby 15 ip 10.0.0.1

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.3
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.4 10.0.0.127

ip dhcp pool sw2
net 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.0.0.1

Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Best regards,
Abzal

Dear Abzal,

Many thanks for your advice,

It's really very smart solution,

But is there any other solution to have full DHCP pool redundancy?

Thanks in advanced,

Ahmed,

Hi,

Glad to help. Actually there is a solution Cisco CNS Registar. But unfortunately I don't experience working with this system. I cannot tell much about it however it provides DHCP/DNS failover.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/netmgtsw/ps1982/index.html

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/netmgtsw/ps5698/ps1982/data_sheet_c78-634879.html

Hope it will help.

Best regards,
Abzal

Dear Abzal,

Many thnaks for your reply,

Yes it's really help me,

I appreciate all your effort,

Many thanks,

Ahmed,