The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
If you switches support it, you might look into REP vs. STP.
Depending on your traffic, transit switch links might be more likely to become bottlenecks.
As per Cisco best design & recommendation you need to fallow the hierarchy of Access, Distribution & Core Layer. You can use daisy chain topology also but if you use not recommended topology it will be difficult to troubleshoot (in case of you face of issue) and you cannot utilize the network properly. Unnecessary traffic will be flooded in your daisy chain network topology.
STP or RSTP you cannot use for this network topology MSTP need to verify.
Just take example SW1 is your main switch (Switch become Root Bridge & majority services) are also running, in case if your SW1 having hardware failure of topology change and SW-10 become you STP root which will decide the traffic flow of your network. And your network will be underutilized.