09-20-2016 11:38 PM - edited 03-08-2019 07:31 AM
I have 4506 standard sup V. Protocol is used HSRP . We are facing the issue to outdrop is increase at couple of port (2/5) out of 5. But there is no service impact.
There is 5 ports in etherchannel.
Please suggest
thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-20-2016 11:45 PM
You mean output drop? Can you share sh int output o those interafce
09-27-2016 05:48 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Etherchannel port loading is impacted by the "nature" of your traffic and the load balancing algorithm being used. Sometimes a different load balancing algorithm will better distribute your traffic. However, even the most optimal choice doesn't avoid the situation that individual flows are going to be directed to particular ports w/o regard to actual load on those ports. I.e. a very active/busy flow, or flows, might congest a port no matter what you do.
Also BTW, on a Sup V, I recall best load distribution might be achieved by using a power of 2 for your number of ports within an Etherchannel, i.e. your choice/usage of 5 ports will generally also contribute to unequal load distribution.
09-20-2016 11:45 PM
You mean output drop? Can you share sh int output o those interafce
09-22-2016 01:18 AM
09-22-2016 01:23 AM
can you post the interface from each member of the port-channel and the port-channel interfaces as well so we can see the problem
Also post the the sh run interface of each port-channel
and --sh run | i load
09-27-2016 05:31 AM
Dear Sir
Please find the output
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
src-dst-mac
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address
IPv4: Source XOR Destination MAC address
IPv6: Source XOR Destination MAC address
Age of the Port-channel = 31d:16h:03m:12s
Logical slot/port = 11/10 Number of ports = 5
Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol = LACP
Port security = Disabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
1 00 Gi3/20 Active 0
0 00 Gi3/47 Active 0
4 00 Gi4/3 Active 0
3 00 Gi4/20 Active 0
2 00 Gi4/48 Active 0
Time since last port bundled: 14d:22h:09m:36s Gi4/3
09-21-2016 05:38 AM
make sure your load balancing correctly with the etherchannel and not all traffic is going down one link only causing it to drop
alter it if you need to
(config)#port-channel load-balance ?
dst-ip Dst IP Addr
dst-mac Dst Mac Addr
dst-mixed-ip-port Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
dst-port Dst TCP/UDP Port
mpls Load Balancing for MPLS packets
src-dst-ip Src XOR Dst IP Addr
src-dst-mac Src XOR Dst Mac Addr
src-dst-mixed-ip-port Src XOR Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
src-dst-port Src XOR Dst TCP/UDP Port
src-ip Src IP Addr
src-mac Src Mac Addr
src-mixed-ip-port Src IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
src-port Src TCP/UDP Port
vlan-dst-ip Vlan, Dst IP Addr
vlan-dst-mixed-ip-port Vlan, Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
vlan-src-dst-ip Vlan, Src XOR Dst IP Addr
vlan-src-dst-mixed-ip-port Vlan, Src XOR Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
vlan-src-ip Vlan, Src IP Addr
vlan-src-mixed-ip-port Vlan, Src IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
Aswell is there qos running on the link ?
you may be spiking queues if the buffer is filling
If you provide more information what your seeing exactly and some config in place we can help further , there is not enough information yet to suggest what the issue is
09-22-2016 01:17 AM
Dear sir
we have two core switches, CS01 is connected with CS02. Protocol running is HSRP / PVST. switch details given below
CS-1:- cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX1120147U
MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V
Last reset from PowerUp
32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory
IOS :- :cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin
CS-2 cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX1120148L
MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V
Last reset from PowerUp
32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
IOS : cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin
thanks a a lot
regqards
raj singH
09871285855
09-23-2016 12:35 AM
Dear sir
Please find the details
show config | i load
port-channel load-balance src-dst-mac
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
load-interval 30
regards
raj singh
09-27-2016 05:48 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Etherchannel port loading is impacted by the "nature" of your traffic and the load balancing algorithm being used. Sometimes a different load balancing algorithm will better distribute your traffic. However, even the most optimal choice doesn't avoid the situation that individual flows are going to be directed to particular ports w/o regard to actual load on those ports. I.e. a very active/busy flow, or flows, might congest a port no matter what you do.
Also BTW, on a Sup V, I recall best load distribution might be achieved by using a power of 2 for your number of ports within an Etherchannel, i.e. your choice/usage of 5 ports will generally also contribute to unequal load distribution.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide