cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2950
Views
0
Helpful
8
Replies

Etherchannel

rajsingh68
Level 1
Level 1

I have 4506 standard sup V.  Protocol is used HSRP . We are facing the issue to outdrop is increase at couple of port (2/5) out of 5. But there is no service impact.

There is 5 ports in etherchannel.

Please suggest

thanks

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

Pawan Raut
Level 4
Level 4

You mean output drop? Can you share sh int output o those interafce

View solution in original post

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Etherchannel port loading is impacted by the "nature" of your traffic and the load balancing algorithm being used.  Sometimes a different load balancing algorithm will better distribute your traffic.  However, even the most optimal choice doesn't avoid the situation that individual flows are going to be directed to particular ports w/o regard to actual load on those ports.  I.e. a very active/busy flow, or flows, might congest a port no matter what you do.

Also BTW, on a Sup V, I recall best load distribution might be achieved by using a power of 2 for your number of ports within an Etherchannel, i.e. your choice/usage of 5 ports will generally also contribute to unequal load distribution.

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8

Pawan Raut
Level 4
Level 4

You mean output drop? Can you share sh int output o those interafce

we have two core switches, CS01 is connected with CS02. Protocol running is HSRP / PVST. switch details given below CS-1:- cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory.  Processor board ID FOX1120147U  MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V  Last reset from PowerUp  32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces  146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces  511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory  IOS :- :cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin  CS-2 cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory.  Processor board ID FOX1120148L  MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V  Last reset from PowerUp  32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces  146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces  511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.  IOS : cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin

can you post the interface from each member of the port-channel and the port-channel interfaces as well so we can see the problem

Also post the the sh run interface of each port-channel

and --sh run | i load

Dear Sir

Please find the output

EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
        src-dst-mac

EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address
  IPv4: Source XOR Destination MAC address
  IPv6: Source XOR Destination MAC address

Age of the Port-channel   = 31d:16h:03m:12s
Logical slot/port   = 11/10          Number of ports = 5
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =   LACP
Port security       = Disabled

Ports in the Port-channel:

Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
  1     00     Gi3/20   Active             0
  0     00     Gi3/47   Active             0
  4     00     Gi4/3    Active             0
  3     00     Gi4/20   Active             0
  2     00     Gi4/48   Active             0

Time since last port bundled:    14d:22h:09m:36s    Gi4/3

Mark Malone
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

make sure your load balancing correctly with the etherchannel and not all traffic is going down one link only causing it to drop

alter it if you need to

(config)#port-channel load-balance ?
  dst-ip                      Dst IP Addr
  dst-mac                     Dst Mac Addr
  dst-mixed-ip-port           Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
  dst-port                    Dst TCP/UDP Port
  mpls                        Load Balancing for MPLS packets
  src-dst-ip                  Src XOR Dst IP Addr
  src-dst-mac                 Src XOR Dst Mac Addr
  src-dst-mixed-ip-port       Src XOR Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
  src-dst-port                Src XOR Dst TCP/UDP Port
  src-ip                      Src IP Addr
  src-mac                     Src Mac Addr
  src-mixed-ip-port           Src IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
  src-port                    Src TCP/UDP Port
  vlan-dst-ip                 Vlan, Dst IP Addr
  vlan-dst-mixed-ip-port      Vlan, Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
  vlan-src-dst-ip             Vlan, Src XOR Dst IP Addr
  vlan-src-dst-mixed-ip-port  Vlan, Src XOR Dst IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port
  vlan-src-ip                 Vlan, Src IP Addr
  vlan-src-mixed-ip-port      Vlan, Src IP Addr and TCP/UDP Port

Aswell is there qos running on the link ?

you may be spiking queues if the buffer is filling

If you provide more information what your seeing exactly and some config in place we can help further , there is not enough information yet to suggest what the issue is

Dear sir

we have two core switches, CS01 is connected with CS02. Protocol running is HSRP / PVST. switch details given below

CS-1:- cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory. 

Processor board ID FOX1120147U 

MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V 

Last reset from PowerUp 

32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces 

146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces 

511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory 

IOS :- :cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin 

CS-2 cisco WS-C4506 (MPC8245) processor (revision 4) with 524288K bytes of memory. 

Processor board ID FOX1120148L 

MPC8245 CPU at 400Mhz, Supervisor V 

Last reset from PowerUp 

32 Virtual Ethernet interfaces 

146 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces 

511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 

IOS : cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG8.bin

thanks a a lot

regqards

raj singH

09871285855

Dear sir

Please find the details

 show config  | i load
port-channel load-balance src-dst-mac
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30
 load-interval 30

regards

raj singh

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

Etherchannel port loading is impacted by the "nature" of your traffic and the load balancing algorithm being used.  Sometimes a different load balancing algorithm will better distribute your traffic.  However, even the most optimal choice doesn't avoid the situation that individual flows are going to be directed to particular ports w/o regard to actual load on those ports.  I.e. a very active/busy flow, or flows, might congest a port no matter what you do.

Also BTW, on a Sup V, I recall best load distribution might be achieved by using a power of 2 for your number of ports within an Etherchannel, i.e. your choice/usage of 5 ports will generally also contribute to unequal load distribution.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card