02-05-2020 04:39 PM
02-05-2020 05:20 PM
Hi,
I would suggest to rely on layer 2 VLANS on the breakout switch instead if going with VRFs. With VRF, you will then required some route leaking between LAN interfaces in global VRF and VRF for wan routers.
Having a breakout switch is good idea, you are saving good interfaces and adding some flexibility to have option for creating subinterfaces.
For the throughput, how much will be the aggregated bandwidth for Internet and WAN links you will be having?. It will be most likely way less than the throughput of the 9300 switch.
02-05-2020 07:13 PM
Thanks Muhamad, are you suggesting L2 vlans just for the complexity of the config on the breakout switch?
couple ASRs will hang off of the 9ks for Connectivity to the DC and the internet circuit. The pipes range from 150 mbps to 500 I believe.
02-26-2020 10:00 AM
02-26-2020 03:54 PM
apologizing fo rmissing your comment. L3 breakouts will add more subnets for you which will add more complexity in your design and you have to then add Routing protocols also.
L2 Breakouts will help you also for HA on the ASR side in future, especially if you configure HSRP , which can be possible with L3 Breakout switch but you may endup increase interaces on the Switch side.
In summary, both will work but L3 will increase some extra configuration and overheads for you interms of Routing and additional subnets while L2 will make your Edge side simpler
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide