03-28-2020 06:48 AM
HI,
We do HSRP over L3 port-channel on ISR4K,we can ping HSRP VIP by SVI on sw3650,but we cannot ping the L3 port-channel on sw3650. Are there any restrictions here?
03-28-2020 08:49 AM
We do not have enough information to be able to identify the issue or make suggestions about solution. Can you provide a simple diagram showing the topology? And can you provide the output of show cdp neighbor from each switch and output of show arp from each switch? And can you post the config of the interfaces?
03-28-2020 09:18 AM
Thanks for you response!
topology:
show cdp nei
------------------ show cdp neighbor ------------------
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - Phone,
D - Remote, C - CVTA, M - Two-port Mac Relay
Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
ISR-2 Gig 1/0/2 151 R S I ISR4431/K Gig 0/0/0
ISR-2 Gig 2/0/2 152 R S I ISR4431/K Gig 0/0/1
ISR-1 Gig 1/0/1 161 R S I ISR4431/K Gig 0/0/0
ISR-1 Gig 2/0/1 157 R S I ISR4431/K Gig 0/0/1
configuration on sw3650 :
!
interface Port-channel1
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface Port-channel2
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 2 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 2 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!
interface Vlan20
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ISR-1:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
interface Port-channel1
ip address 10.1.2.252 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat inside
standby version 2
standby 20 ip 10.1.2.254
standby 20 priority 120
standby 20 preempt
standby 20 track 1 decrement 30
negotiation auto
ISR-2:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
interface Port-channel1
ip address 10.1.2.253 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat inside
standby version 2
standby 20 ip 10.1.2.254
negotiation auto
I can see the ARP information of the ISR interface on the SW3650, and the Arp information of the 3650 SVI interface on the ISR.So I feel very strange, I do n’t know if you have encountered such a problem
03-28-2020 09:33 AM
Thanks for the additional information. The config seems ok. Can you clarify what is doing the ping that does not work?
One thing I did notice in the config, but do not believe it is related to your question. ISR 1 standby is doing track and would drop it priority based on something. ISR 2 standby does not include preempt. So even if ISR 1 drops its priority it will remain the active router for HSRP. For the track to be effective ISR 2 needs to have preempt enabled.
03-28-2020 09:50 AM
03-28-2020 12:08 PM
Thanks for the additional information. Could you post the output of these commands on the switch
show vlan
show interface status
show arp
03-28-2020 01:18 PM
In addition to the outputs Richard is asking, can you also provide the output of "sh hsrp ?" (not exactly sure what is the command on the 4Ks) to make sure the 2 ASRs can actually see each other?
HTH
03-29-2020 03:18 AM
03-29-2020 03:16 AM
03-29-2020 09:31 AM
Thank you for the outputs. I find it very strange that the switch arp table has entries for the ISR physical interfaces and for the virtual interface, but the switch is not able to ping the ISR. As I look at the arp entries I notice that the mac address for the HSRP virtual address is very similar to the mac address of the physical interfaces and is not at all like the mac address that HSRP version 2 should be using. This makes me wonder if we are dealing with some issue for support of Etherchannel on the ISR routers.
03-29-2020 11:35 AM
Hi,
for testing, can you simply use one 2 physical interfaces and not use Portchannel at all and see if things improve? We are just trying to eliminate the Portchannel as the culprit.
HTH
03-29-2020 09:42 PM
03-29-2020 09:46 PM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide