07-05-2014 10:46 AM - edited 03-07-2019 07:56 PM
Greetings,
I've been working on my GNS3 labs and I just finished configuring Routing on a Stick: Trunking (L2 switch w/multiple VLANS and trunk interface to > Router); and I've also completed a lab with L3 Switching and SVI's. From what I've seen in some environments most network setups looks like this, Server > L2 Switch > ASA (ASA Handles Inter-vlan routing); another alternative to that would be Server > L3 Switch > ASA; In this latter scenario where would/should the inter-vlan routing happen? Could a L3 switch and ASA work together? Are there benefits to either setup? It seems to me that the ASA at it's heart is a L3 switch with WAN capabilities so is there even need for a L3 switch? What's the most common setup for ASA's?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-05-2014 11:45 AM
Hello.
First of all ASA is a security device. So how you use it, is really depend on your security requirements.
If you have some special security constraints on inter VLAN traffic routing (like in DMZ between different applications), then ASA should be routing traffic.
If you have a requirement to minimize latency and maximize throughoutput of your routing,, then L3 switch is your choice.
PS: L3 switch has it's cost in term of purchase and support, as well as ASA; so cost might become an important criteria.
07-05-2014 11:45 AM
Hello.
First of all ASA is a security device. So how you use it, is really depend on your security requirements.
If you have some special security constraints on inter VLAN traffic routing (like in DMZ between different applications), then ASA should be routing traffic.
If you have a requirement to minimize latency and maximize throughoutput of your routing,, then L3 switch is your choice.
PS: L3 switch has it's cost in term of purchase and support, as well as ASA; so cost might become an important criteria.
07-05-2014 01:23 PM
Hi Vasilii,
If I can apply ACL's to a L3 switch then what additional benefit can the ASA provide that the L3 switch can't do? Couldn't the L3 switch accommodate the special security constraints on inter VLAN traffic routing? I've read that by default L3 switches allow all traffic opposed to ASAs which block all traffic.
07-06-2014 02:10 AM
Hello.
First of all ASA is a great NAT device. So, if you need flexibility in NAT, then ASA is your chose.
ACLs you mentioned on L3 switch are one-way only, at the same time ASA is a stateful device, that tracks all the connections and may look deep inside (up to L7).
Let try other way: what are your security requirements and what is your budget? Do you need high availability (more than 1 device and automatic failover)?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide