01-27-2011 02:19 AM - edited 03-06-2019 03:13 PM
Hi Folks,
I have new switch CISCO WS-C4510R-E with SUP6-E. I am getting following messages on my console.
*Jan 27 03:04:08.515: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
*Jan 27 03:04:09.707: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te6/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
What is wrong with my power or something. Below pasted show power and show power modules out put.Do I need to contact TAC? any help is highly appricated.
SW#show power
Power Fan Inline
Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status
------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- -------
PS1 PWR-C45-6000ACV AC 6000W good good good
PS1-1 110V good
PS1-2 110V good
PS2 PWR-C45-6000ACV AC 6000W good good good
PS2-1 110V good
PS2-2 110V good
Power supplies needed by system : 1
Power supplies currently available : 2
Power Summary Maximum
(in Watts) Used Available
---------------------- ---- ---------
System Power (12V) 1125 1700
Inline Power (-50V) 0 935
Backplane Power (3.3V) 40 40
---------------------- ---- ---------
Total 1165 (not to exceed Total Maximum Available = 2100)
Output Power To Chassis Input Power
======================================= ==================
Power Measurement System Power (12V) Inline Power (-50V)
(in Watts) (+/- 12W) (+/- 50W) (+/- 5%)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------- ------------------
PS1 168 0 280
PS2 156 50 343
------------------ ------------------ ------------------- ------------------
Total 324 50 623
SW#show power module
Watts Used of System Power(12V)
Mod Model budgeted instantaneous peak out of reset in reset
---- ------------------- -------- ------------- ------ ------------ --------
1 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
2 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
3 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
4 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
5 WS-X45-SUP6-E 260 -- -- 260 260
6 WS-X45-SUP6-E 185 -- -- 185 185
7 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
8 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
9 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
10 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
-- Fan Tray 200 -- -- -- --
------------------------- -------- ------------- ------ ------------ --------
Total 1125 -- -- 925 645
Watts used of Chassis Inline Power (-50V)
Inline Power Admin Inline Power Oper
Mod Model PS Device PS Device Efficiency
---- ------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------
1 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 17 16 94
2 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
3 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
4 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
5 WS-X45-SUP6-E - - - - -
6 WS-X45-SUP6-E - - - - -
7 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 5 5 94
8 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 17 16 94
9 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
10 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------
01-27-2011 06:28 AM
Hi,
It looks like you are hitting bug CSCth08212.
Bug Details:
Symptom:
If a X2 or SFP is in the inactive uplink ports of a Supervisor V-10GE,
Supervisor II+10GE, Supervisor 6-E or Supervisor 6-LE, it may cause
threshold violations to be reported once every 10 minutes.
Workaround:
Remove the X2 or SFP from the inactive uplink port.
It is non-service impacting and will stop once the port is active or the
transceiver is removed from the port.
Regards,
Swati
Please rate if you find content useful
04-25-2011 06:47 AM
Hi,
I having the same problem.
The bug ID provided is Cisco internal, do you have the public bug ID?
10-25-2011 02:13 AM
The Cisco Bug Toolkit won't show you any details on bug ID CSCth08212, as it automatically redirects you to the superseding bug ID CSCte94616 (which is under non-disclosure).
You can see the original bug info when using the Bug Search Tool (still in beta). It contains the same information as Swati has already posted though.
Regards,
Arjan.
05-07-2012 06:30 AM
Hello,
I have same issues on our network on all non Cisco X2 modules starting on nearly the same day (devices have nearly same update). I can't say that it is only cosmetic nature due to the fact that after a lot of these messages happened I registered SPT topology changes. This happened on several of my devices but it is not very often. For our customers it is a two second hit, where services are not available. Our software is on the 15.0 release train so a lot of possibilities to upgrade to higher versions are not given at this time.
Are in the above mentioned Cisco internal Bug (ID CSCth08212/CSCte94616) additional information which can be helpful but are not open to people outside TAC?
With kind regards
Stefan
I forgot to mention that the message in my case describes a lot of temperature alerts (ranging from -130°C up to 130°C) that are violated and less of alerts belonging to the power.
12-17-2012 01:07 AM
Hi Folks,
Watch out for %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION Vs SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION.
The first one is printed for the ports that are configured, but not connected/active.
You can avoid such error messages simply shutting down unused ports.
The latter indicates that there is a real threshold violation.
For more details on these error messages, check out.
07-15-2014 06:05 AM
Thanks Swati,
Your post is absolutely correct, I had the same issue and it seems like what you have mentioned seems to be the same what I am experiencing here. Thanks for the update.
Thanks & Regards,
04-28-2016 09:37 PM
i am getting same
Apr 29 00:04:35.823: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -26.7 dBm, Threshold value: -18.4 dBm.
but my port is showing
Te5/2 notconnect 1 full auto 10GBase-LR
Please tell me what to do.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide