01-27-2011 02:19 AM - edited 03-06-2019 03:13 PM
Hi Folks,
I have new switch CISCO WS-C4510R-E with SUP6-E. I am getting following messages on my console.
*Jan 27 03:04:08.515: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
*Jan 27 03:04:09.707: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te6/2: Tx power low alarm; Operating value: -40.0 dBm, Threshold value: -11.3 dBm.
What is wrong with my power or something. Below pasted show power and show power modules out put.Do I need to contact TAC? any help is highly appricated.
SW#show power
Power Fan Inline
Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status
------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- -------
PS1 PWR-C45-6000ACV AC 6000W good good good
PS1-1 110V good
PS1-2 110V good
PS2 PWR-C45-6000ACV AC 6000W good good good
PS2-1 110V good
PS2-2 110V good
Power supplies needed by system : 1
Power supplies currently available : 2
Power Summary Maximum
(in Watts) Used Available
---------------------- ---- ---------
System Power (12V) 1125 1700
Inline Power (-50V) 0 935
Backplane Power (3.3V) 40 40
---------------------- ---- ---------
Total 1165 (not to exceed Total Maximum Available = 2100)
Output Power To Chassis Input Power
======================================= ==================
Power Measurement System Power (12V) Inline Power (-50V)
(in Watts) (+/- 12W) (+/- 50W) (+/- 5%)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------- ------------------
PS1 168 0 280
PS2 156 50 343
------------------ ------------------ ------------------- ------------------
Total 324 50 623
SW#show power module
Watts Used of System Power(12V)
Mod Model budgeted instantaneous peak out of reset in reset
---- ------------------- -------- ------------- ------ ------------ --------
1 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
2 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
3 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
4 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
5 WS-X45-SUP6-E 260 -- -- 260 260
6 WS-X45-SUP6-E 185 -- -- 185 185
7 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
8 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
9 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
10 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 60 -- -- 60 25
-- Fan Tray 200 -- -- -- --
------------------------- -------- ------------- ------ ------------ --------
Total 1125 -- -- 925 645
Watts used of Chassis Inline Power (-50V)
Inline Power Admin Inline Power Oper
Mod Model PS Device PS Device Efficiency
---- ------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------
1 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 17 16 94
2 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
3 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
4 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
5 WS-X45-SUP6-E - - - - -
6 WS-X45-SUP6-E - - - - -
7 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 5 5 94
8 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 17 16 94
9 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
10 WS-X4548-RJ45V+ 0 0 11 10 94
------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------
01-27-2011 06:28 AM
Hi,
It looks like you are hitting bug CSCth08212.
Bug Details:
Symptom:
If a X2 or SFP is in the inactive uplink ports of a Supervisor V-10GE,
Supervisor II+10GE, Supervisor 6-E or Supervisor 6-LE, it may cause
threshold violations to be reported once every 10 minutes.
Workaround:
Remove the X2 or SFP from the inactive uplink port.
It is non-service impacting and will stop once the port is active or the
transceiver is removed from the port.
Regards,
Swati
Please rate if you find content useful
04-25-2011 06:47 AM
Hi,
I having the same problem.
The bug ID provided is Cisco internal, do you have the public bug ID?
10-25-2011 02:13 AM
The Cisco Bug Toolkit won't show you any details on bug ID CSCth08212, as it automatically redirects you to the superseding bug ID CSCte94616 (which is under non-disclosure).
You can see the original bug info when using the Bug Search Tool (still in beta). It contains the same information as Swati has already posted though.
Regards,
Arjan.
05-07-2012 06:30 AM
Hello,
I have same issues on our network on all non Cisco X2 modules starting on nearly the same day (devices have nearly same update). I can't say that it is only cosmetic nature due to the fact that after a lot of these messages happened I registered SPT topology changes. This happened on several of my devices but it is not very often. For our customers it is a two second hit, where services are not available. Our software is on the 15.0 release train so a lot of possibilities to upgrade to higher versions are not given at this time.
Are in the above mentioned Cisco internal Bug (ID CSCth08212/CSCte94616) additional information which can be helpful but are not open to people outside TAC?
With kind regards
Stefan
I forgot to mention that the message in my case describes a lot of temperature alerts (ranging from -130°C up to 130°C) that are violated and less of alerts belonging to the power.
12-17-2012 01:07 AM
Hi Folks,
Watch out for %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION Vs SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION.
The first one is printed for the ports that are configured, but not connected/active.
You can avoid such error messages simply shutting down unused ports.
The latter indicates that there is a real threshold violation.
For more details on these error messages, check out.
07-15-2014 06:05 AM
Thanks Swati,
Your post is absolutely correct, I had the same issue and it seems like what you have mentioned seems to be the same what I am experiencing here. Thanks for the update.
Thanks & Regards,
04-28-2016 09:37 PM
i am getting same
Apr 29 00:04:35.823: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -26.7 dBm, Threshold value: -18.4 dBm.
but my port is showing
Te5/2 notconnect 1 full auto 10GBase-LR
Please tell me what to do.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: