Nexus 9000 and PBR help needed - Need Help with Workaround
I ran into an issue with PBR feature parity while migrating functionality from a 6500 to a Nexus 9396PX running ver. 7.0(3)I2(2b). In the PBR route-map on the 6500, It was using the "set ip default next-hop" command to override the default route and redirect my interesting traffic to its appropriate next hop.
The 9396 seems to only support the "set ip next-hop" which from my understanding means that it does not care if there is already a longest prefix match in the routing table, it simply overwrites the next hop no matter what. This causes east west traffic to break on my network since it sends that traffic up to my firewall and then back into the network resulting in asymmetric routing that the 9k drops.
Is there an alternate solution besides PBR that would be better to send my interesting traffic to the preferred gateway? I have been reading about ITD but I am unsure if it would offer the solution I am trying to obtain.
Currently when changing the Authentication Template under the Onboarding section, there is no choice but to remove SGTs, VNs and IP Pools which clearly disrupt existing services.
Hitless Authentication was introduced in...
Hi, I want to redistribute OMP routes to BGP, i have the doubt if all of the OMP prefixes located in the local vEdge will be redistributed to BGP or just the connected+static networks located in the vEdge. Also how can i restrict some OMP prefix...
Let's say we have two routers configured as RP candidates for auto-RP: R1 - "advertising" its loopback0 interface IP address 18.104.22.168 as the RP for these groups:22.214.171.124/32126.96.36.199/32188.8.131.52/24184.108.40.206/16 R2 - "advertising" its loopback0 int...
hi,i just performed an IOS upgrade and got a report that admin can't create L2 VLANs.i noticed the 'vtp primary force' and 'vtp primary mst' was applied to one of the core switch and perhaps got lost after the upgrade.how to keep the VTP primary persisten...