- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 01:31 PM - edited 03-08-2019 12:00 AM
We just upgraded our core switch to a Nexus 9396, which is connected to dual UCS 6248 FI's and also individually to some Dell R710's with a dual 10Gb Ethernet card. When connecting these standalone servers with an etherchannel VPC, the management IP address goes up and down and some hosts can talk while others can't. If I leave one port disabled, it works fine. However, as soon as both are enabled, connectivity goes down. These ESXi servers are on a standard license, so distributed switches are out of the question. I did enable an eval license and setup a vDS using the enhanced LACP and that works great, it just won't work as a standard etherchannel with a standard virtual switch. The connectivity to the 6248's is also working without any issues running in LACP. Below is the configuration:
Nexus SW01:
interface Ethernet1/5 description ESX vPC Member switchport mode trunk channel-group 202 no shutdown interface port-channel202 description ESX switchport mode trunk vpc 202
Nexus SW02:
interface Ethernet1/5 description ESX vPC Member switchport mode trunk channel-group 202 no shutdown interface port-channel202 description ESX switchport mode trunk vpc 202
ESXi configuration is a standard switch with "Route based on IP hash" and both adapters active. Am I missing something? Is this setup not supported? Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Other Switches
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:24 PM
What happens if you don't use Portchannel, just 2 10gig (1/5 on each switch)?
I think the on the ESX host the NICs use HA and can use only one link. Once one fails it uses the other one. I think, I remember seeing the same issue with ESX hosts a couple of years ago.
Can you test the redundancy with physical ports and no Portchannels?
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:01 PM
Is VPC configured between the 2 9396 switches?
What is the output of "sh vpc"?
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:06 PM
Yes. Here's the output from SW02:
vPC domain id : 10 Peer status : peer adjacency formed ok vPC keep-alive status : peer is alive Configuration consistency status : success Per-vlan consistency status : success Type-2 consistency status : success vPC role : secondary, operational primary Number of vPCs configured : 10 Peer Gateway : Enabled Dual-active excluded VLANs : - Graceful Consistency Check : Enabled Auto-recovery status : Enabled (timeout = 240 seconds)
And output from sh vpc 202
vPC status ---------------------------------------------------------------------- id Port Status Consistency Reason Active vlans -- ---- ------ ----------- ------ ------------ 202 Po202 up success success 1,10,21-22, 24,51-52,78 ,97-101,201 ,204,244-24 5,411-413,4 ....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:24 PM
What happens if you don't use Portchannel, just 2 10gig (1/5 on each switch)?
I think the on the ESX host the NICs use HA and can use only one link. Once one fails it uses the other one. I think, I remember seeing the same issue with ESX hosts a couple of years ago.
Can you test the redundancy with physical ports and no Portchannels?
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:34 PM
I didn't try that..I will give it a shot. Do I need to be concerned with port flapping? I'll make the change and let you know.
Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 02:44 PM
That worked! I did some testing and watched through the ESXi console as I enabled and disabled links. Failover and redundancy worked well. I also didn't see any port flapping messages on the Nexus. I can live with this..these aren't heavy production servers. I appreciate the help!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2015 03:54 PM
Thanks for the rating and glad to know its working now.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2015 09:37 AM
Sorry to reply an answered discussion ,for me jason configuration just worked.
" Can you test the redundancy with physical ports and no Portchannels? "
You mean put the vpc direct under the interface like below
interface Ethernet1/5 description ESX vPC Member switchport mode trunk vpc 202 no shutdown
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 06:18 AM
I have it running with no portchannels or VPC. vSphere takes care of the redundancy and failover. I do have some hosts using the distributed switches, and for those I setup a true LACP active/active using VPC and that works well.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 06:44 AM
Do i need to do anything on vmware side ?
Thanks for the information
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 06:48 AM
For a standard switch, no. I have mine setup with the defaults of "Route based on originating virtual port ID" and "Link status only" for load balancing and failover detection.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 06:59 AM
Hi,
For some reason it did not work with me well , some guest facing intermittent connectivity .
can you share ur lacp conf for vds .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 07:32 AM
Here is our standard switch configuration (same on both switches). The standard switch has both adapters as active with default settings.
interface Ethernet1/3
description ESX1
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
Here is the config using VPC and distributed switching (same on both switches):
interface Ethernet1/5
description ESX30
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
channel-group 202 mode active
interface port-channel202
description ESX30 vPC
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
vpc 202
For distributed switches, you have to configure LACP otherwise it won't work. You can only setup link aggregations through the web client (using vsphere 6, believe it's the same with 5.5). When creating a link aggregation, make sure you select mode active and load balancing source/destination IP address, TCP/UDP port and VLAN.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 07:35 AM
Thanks a million
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2015 07:36 AM
Anytime. Let me know if you need anything else.
