04-12-2013 03:09 AM - edited 03-07-2019 12:46 PM
Hey everybody,
I'm working on a project with IPv6 and am currently trying out some stuff with OSPF.
But when i configure a network zith 3 routers, 1 routers always gets wrong routes (Router3).
What might be causing this or how can i fix/prevent this?
I have ipv6 enabled on all the interfaced and the routers have ipv6 unicast-routing.
Router3 ospf route:
O FC00::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::209:7CFF:FE9B:E802, FastEthernet1/1
O FC00:0:0:1::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::20C:85FF:FE48:DA01, FastEthernet1/1
O FC00:0:0:4::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::20C:85FF:FE48:DA01, FastEthernet1/1
So whenever a packet has to go over Router3 - FA1/0 it fails because there is no route
and there is no dubbel route for when it has to go to network FC00:0:0:1::/64
Router1 ospf route:
O FC00:0:0:2::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::20C:85FF:FE48:DA02, FastEthernet1/0
via FE80::202:16FF:FE30:8301, FastEthernet1/1
O FC00:0:0:4::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::20C:85FF:FE48:DA02, FastEthernet1/0
O FC00:0:0:5::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::202:16FF:FE30:8301, FastEthernet1/1
Router2 ospf route:
O FC00::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::209:7CFF:FE9B:E801, FastEthernet1/1
O FC00:0:0:3::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::209:7CFF:FE9B:E801, FastEthernet1/1
via FE80::202:16FF:FE30:8302, FastEthernet1/0
O FC00:0:0:5::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::202:16FF:FE30:8302, FastEthernet1/0
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Thomassen Ken
04-12-2013 03:41 AM
Hi,
You may need to check OSPF configuration of interfaces between R1/R3. Because R3 is not establishing neighbor relationship with R1 as result does not see routes that R1 is advertising.
R1:
sh ipv6 protocols
sh ipv6 ospf ne
sh ipv6 ospf int
Hope it will help.
Best regards,
Abzal
04-12-2013 05:09 AM
Hey Abzal,
Thank you for the fast responce.
I have looked into the items you stated in your post.
Everything looks fine to me, but the problem is still there.
i have included a text file with the output of the
show ipv6 protocols
show ipv6 ospf neighbor
show ipv6 ospf interface
maybe i overlooked something?
Best regards,
Ken Thomassen
04-12-2013 07:48 AM
Hi Ken,
I've looked output you provided and config look OK. But I need some extra info:
R3:
sh run | sec router ospf
The problem might be configured maximum-paths command under OSPFv3 configuration. As you might know OSPF does only equal load balancing. Everything else looks correct for me.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk831/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094806.shtml
Note. I've checked on GNS3 lab worked prefectly. I didn't tried it on Packet Tracer.
Hope it will help.
Best regards,
Abzal
04-12-2013 08:12 AM
Hi Ken,
The only thing that I find abnormal is the following:
Router3 ospf route:
O FC00::/64 [110/2]
via FE80::209:7CFF:FE9B:E802, FastEthernet1/1
The link-local adddress is from R1 and the interface is to R2. This points to either a bug or misconfiguration. What IOS version are you running on R3? Could you please provide the full configuration for R1, R2 and R3?
Regards
04-15-2013 01:41 AM
Hi,
I am using Packet Tracer 5.3.3
@Abzal: I have tried the maximum paths for ospf, but the packet tracer routers do not recognise these commands. Packet Tracer also does not recognise the pipe command "sh run | sec router ospf"
@Harold: I have included the running-config off the routers with the version they are running (the same on all).
Best regards,
Ken
04-15-2013 05:48 AM
Ken,
The configs look good. The only issue I can see at this point is a problem with the IOS version running in this lab. 12.4(15)T1 is quite old. It would definitely be worth upgrading to a more recent version.
Regards
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide