10-19-2011 01:16 AM - edited 03-07-2019 02:54 AM
Hi all.
I have two windows 2008 servers on a gigabit cisco network. Below are ping reponses between the two servers. I have a stacked cluster of catalyst 3750 switches. I see ping responses mostly under 1ms but there are blips of up to 9ms. Is this normal on a gigabit network? If not, what can be done to improve this?
Pinging 10.192.1.15 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.1.15: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 10.192.1.15:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 0ms
Pinging 10.192.3.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.192.3.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 10.192.3.3:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 9ms, Average = 0ms
10-19-2011 02:57 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
There might be nothing wrong with your network. Most hosts respond to ping as a lower priority relative to other traffic. It's possible your server was busy doing something "more important".
To get accurate timings, you need to you a specific test protocol. For example, Cisco's SLA supports a special responder to increase accuracy.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide