12-12-2021 04:25 AM
Hi Community, the best of the internet !!
I would like to check with the community if you have had the experience of configuring a Port-channel level 3 between a Catalyst 9300 Switch and an ASA 5506 Firewall, and at the same time sharing OSPF routing information through that Port-channel.
Is it possible to establish a point-to-point OSPF link between the catalyst 9300 switch and the ASA Firewall through a port-channel? I don't see the command "ip ospf network point-to-point" in the configuration menu within the port-channel of the ASA firewall.
I have enabled OSPF on both devices because I want to advertise, through the port-channel, two subnets that are behind the ASA firewall (directly connected), and at the same time to pass traffic from a third network that is not directly connected to the ASA, which means that the ASA will serve as the transit of this third network in such a way that this network can communicate with the networks connected to the Catayst 9300.
The Port-channel config as follow:
(Catalyst 9300)
interface Port-channel1
description LINK TO ASA_Transit
no switchport
dampening
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip pim sparse-mode
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf hello-interval 5
ip ospf 10 area 10
logging event link-status
carrier-delay msec 0
(ASA5506):
interface Port-channel1
nameif inside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255
As you can see, there are very few port-channel commands to configure on the ASA firewall.
I would be very grateful if someone shares their experience or knows how to detect the problem that exists in the configuration, or simply that I have not had any command configured, etc.
I have many doubts with this configuration and especially with the command "ip ospf network point-to-point" on the Catalyst side.
Thank you in advance and hoping that this community has gone through this experience ...
Regards
Hann
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-16-2021 06:24 AM
Hi Deepak
Thank you, yesterday we installed and the port-channel start working fine. I will vote and accept your solution.
Now we have to fight to try to make that the users behind one of the firewall interfaces can obtain their configuration from a remote DHCP, located three router hops from other of the firewall interfaces. So far we're losing the battle ..
Thank you again ...
Hann
12-16-2021 06:27 AM
12-12-2021 07:00 AM
Hi,
What is a version of Cisco ASA? As I know Cisco ASA commands are a little different from Cisco Switch or router as "ospf network point-to-point " might work for you.
Here is a document for you
12-12-2021 07:04 AM
12-12-2021 07:28 AM
Try with the above command and it might work for you.
12-16-2021 06:24 AM
Hi Deepak
Thank you, yesterday we installed and the port-channel start working fine. I will vote and accept your solution.
Now we have to fight to try to make that the users behind one of the firewall interfaces can obtain their configuration from a remote DHCP, located three router hops from other of the firewall interfaces. So far we're losing the battle ..
Thank you again ...
Hann
12-12-2021 10:12 AM
Hello,
as far as I recall, port channel subinterfaces offer more options:
interface Port-channel1.10
nameif inside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255
--> ip ospf neytwork
12-16-2021 06:27 AM
Thank georg
You´re right
Regards
Hann
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide