02-11-2016 07:50 PM - edited 03-08-2019 04:34 AM
Hi to all,
When i create a Port Channel on an ASR920 by default it is a L3 Port Channel, how can i make it L2?
1 Po1(RD) LACP Gi0/0/11(D)
RU - L3 port-channel UP State
SU - L2 port-channel UP state
Because the remote site is a ME3600 configured as L2 Port Channel
When i configure the L3 Port Channel on an ASR901 as "channel-group 1 mode on" it brings up but ASR920 only have mode active or passive
Could anybody help me please?
Thanks
02-11-2016 09:35 PM
Here are the instructions for doing this.
02-12-2016 05:19 AM
thanks but that article is about ASR901 configuration, i need to configure it on an ASR920
02-12-2016 05:49 AM
Hey here is the 920 doc
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/configuration/guide/ce/b_ce_xe-313s-asr920-book/b_ce_xe-313s-asr920-book_chapter_01010.html#GUID-82096A30-31B4-4F31-B812-FCC87D60DFE0
It does not look like the 920 supports on mode and has to use the either lacp or pagp looking at the doc , always best to negotiate the po rather than to force it in most cases and not use the protocol , can you not change the 901 to use lacp , 901 as active and 920 as passive
What do you mean it becomes layer 3 , that only happens to a port-channel when you apply the ip address , does it no allow the channel-group syntax until an ip is on the po ?
02-12-2016 06:00 AM
thanks for your answer,.
currently i have an ASR901 connected to a ME3600 (i don´t have managment of it), ASR901 is configured as L3 Port Channel with LACP mode active and ME3600 is configured as L2 Port Channel with LACP mode active.
I need to change my ASR901 to an ASR920 to support VPLS but when i configure ASR920 as L3 Port Channel with LACP mode active it does not came up.
I tested on the ASR901 a L3 Port Channel as mode on and it works but i can not configure mode on in ASR920
In a ME3600 you need to configure the channel-group first and the Port Channel is created by default. In ASR920 you have to create the interface Port Channel first and the channel-group later
02-12-2016 06:08 AM
Hey so 1 side is layer 3 setup but the other is layer 2 and the port-channel formed , can you post the show etherchannel summ is it formed as layer 2 though , I cant see how it would form as layer 3 with only 1 side having an ip address ?
If the ME3600 is active did you try passive on the ASR in channel-group
02-12-2016 06:49 AM
I don't have management of the me3600 but im sure it is configured as L2 Port Channel because they have configured service instances on it, in the ASR901 it also have service instances configured on it but the Port Channel always shows as L3:
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(RU) LACP Gi0/6(P) Gi0/7(P)
interface Port-channel5
mtu 2000
no ip address
load-interval 30
no negotiation auto
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
service instance 100 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 100
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 100
!
02-12-2016 07:29 AM
Yes that's different compared to normal IOS I would expect to see SU but saying that the doc shows the same output RU when configured the same and also SU - L2 port-channel UP state
so on the 901 you have the option of channel-group on which works and syncs up with ME3600 , that would make me think its set to on as well on the ME side
Now need to replace that with 920 but option channel-group on is not available you tried active it did not work and you tried passive and it did not work yes
To me really need to see what's configured on the ME3600 or at least ask them for the config of the po ,because I don't think anything you change on your side will bring it up as your out of options in terms of syntax , I would be looking at getting them to go lacp active then you match it on your side
This example shows how to configure channel group number 5 and include it in the channel group.
Device1# configure terminal Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Device1(config)# interface port 5 Device1(config-if)# *Aug 20 17:06:14.417: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel5, changed state to down *Aug 20 17:06:25.413: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel5, changed state to down Device1(config-if)# Device1(config-if)# interface gigabitethernet 0/0/2 Device1(config-if)# channel-group 5 mode active Device1(config-if)# *Aug 20 17:07:43.713: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2, changed state to down *Aug 20 17:07:44.713: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2, changed state to down *Aug 20 17:07:45.093: %C10K_ALARM-6-INFO: ASSERT CRITICAL GigE 0/0/2 Physical Port Link Down *Aug 20 17:07:45.093: %C10K_ALARM-6-INFO: CLEAR CRITICAL GigE 0/0/2 Physical Port Link Down *Aug 20 17:07:47.093: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2, changed state to up *Aug 20 17:07:48.093: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2, changed state to up *Aug 20 17:07:48.957: GigabitEthernet0/0/2 added as member-1 to port-channel5 *Aug 20 17:07:51.957: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel5, changed state to up Device1(config-if)# end Device1# *Aug 20 17:08:00.933: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console Device1# show etherchannel summary Flags: D - down P/bndl - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s/susp - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator M - not in use, minimum links not met u - unsuitable for bundling w - waiting to be aggregated d - default port Number of channel-groups in use: 1 Number of aggregators: 1 Group Port-channel Protocol Ports ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------- 1 Po1(RU) LACP Te0/3/0(bndl) Te0/3/1(hot-sby)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide