04-26-2018 06:34 AM - edited 03-08-2019 02:48 PM
I have cisco router 1900, the router has two operating interfaces g0/0 (connected to wan), g0/1 (connected to lan). We have around 50 mb of bandwidth from our ISP but during peak hours we experience drops outs due to other users and guests network activity and.
I need some Video Broadcasts Devices to be prioritized for videoconferencing. Here is the following code i made for that, i need it to be reviewed please.
enable
copy r s
configure terminal
access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.224 0.0.0.31
class-map video
match access-group 1
exit
policy-map video-police
class video
set dscp af41
bandwidth percent 25
class class-default
fair-queue
exit
int g0/0
service-policy output video-police
do show policy-map
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-26-2018 06:52 AM
Hello,
I would consider this:
1. Classify traffic based on port and protocol rather than on a standard ACL; in your case all the traffic from specific subnet will be prioritized no matter if it is video or not
2. I am not sure what congestion management mechanism you want to use. If video is a business critical and should get through in an event of congestion (and traffic amount is less than 25% of total bandwidth) - use LLQ. If not - consider to use CBWFQ and WRED for other traffic you have to avoid congestion and TCP global synchronization for all traffic
Hope this will help.
04-26-2018 06:52 AM
Hello,
I would consider this:
1. Classify traffic based on port and protocol rather than on a standard ACL; in your case all the traffic from specific subnet will be prioritized no matter if it is video or not
2. I am not sure what congestion management mechanism you want to use. If video is a business critical and should get through in an event of congestion (and traffic amount is less than 25% of total bandwidth) - use LLQ. If not - consider to use CBWFQ and WRED for other traffic you have to avoid congestion and TCP global synchronization for all traffic
Hope this will help.
04-26-2018 07:46 AM
Hi, nixpengu1n
Thank you for your reply.
1. It´s true, i will need to see which ports are using the videoconferences.
2. You are right, video is a business critical and should get through in an event of congestion.
So should i use the priority command instead of the bandwidth command?
What value do you recommend me for video? here is the new code
enable
copy r s
configure terminal
access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.224 0.0.0.31
class-map video
match access-group 1
exit
policy-map video-police
class video
set dscp af41
priority 50
class class-default
fair-queue
exit
int g0/0
service-policy output video-police
do show policy-map
Thanks.
04-26-2018 08:00 AM
Hello,
Based on router architecture and Cisco best practices you should not use more that 25% of your interface bandwidth for LLQ. So based on your requirements I would recommend to calculate what bandwidth you really need for video and then either use LLQ (it is is lower that 25% of your interface bandwidth) or consider CBWFQ with WRED for all traffic (or even shaping or policing if necessary).
But what you can do for now - use 25% for LLQ for your video and see will it suffer or not. If not and everyone is happy - your problem is sorted. If not - investigate further.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide