08-13-2012 05:24 AM - edited 03-07-2019 08:18 AM
I have configured two routers to have RP of the same group 239.0.0.1, at any one time there should one RP for group 239.0.0.1, what I understand if there are two auto-rp for the same group the highest ip address wins the RP election, however this is not the case....
I just want to clarify if there are two auto-rp of the same group which router is elected as the RP?
Router 1 multicast configuration
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 5 group-list 1
ip pim send-rp-discovery scope 5
access-list 1 permit 239.0.0.1
!
interface Vlan10
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
!
interface Vlan30
ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 192.168.100.150 255.255.255.255
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
ip multicast-routing
Router 2 multicast configuration
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 5
ip pim send-rp-discovery scope 5
!
interface Vlan10
ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
!
interface Vlan30
ip address 192.168.30.2 255.255.255.0
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 192.168.100.151 255.255.255.255
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
end
ip multicast-routing
mroute
By right router 2 should be the RP since its loopback address is higher than router 1. But...
C7609-2#sh ip mroute 239.0.0.1
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,
L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,
T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,
X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,
U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,
Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,
V - RD & Vector, v - Vector
Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner
Timers: Uptime/Expires
Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode
(*, 239.0.0.1), 01:46:45/stopped, RP 192.168.100.150, flags: SJPCF
Incoming interface: Vlan30, RPF nbr 192.168.30.1, Partial-SC
Outgoing interface list: Null
(192.168.10.103, 239.0.0.1), 00:50:00/00:02:50, flags: FT
Incoming interface: Vlan10, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0, RPF-MFD
Outgoing interface list:
Vlan30, Forward/Sparse-Dense, 00:50:01/00:02:26, H, A
C7609-2#
When I shutdown router1's loopback0 interface router2's loopback0 becomes the RP, I would like to clarify if two auto-rps are configured for the same MC group the highest ip address wins the RP election right? Or is it the other way round....
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-13-2012 05:36 AM
Hello,
Your setup is slightly more complex in that one of the RP candidates advertises a list of groups for which it is interested to become a RP while the other RP candidate would like to become a RP for all multicast groups. Perhaps this interaction modifies the selection.
I suggest you go over the AutoRP specification in these two documents carefully - sorry for simply diverting you to another document but I believe that the behavior will be described there.
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/specs/pim-autorp-spec01.txt
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/autorp.html
Best regards,
Peter
08-13-2012 05:36 AM
Hello,
Your setup is slightly more complex in that one of the RP candidates advertises a list of groups for which it is interested to become a RP while the other RP candidate would like to become a RP for all multicast groups. Perhaps this interaction modifies the selection.
I suggest you go over the AutoRP specification in these two documents carefully - sorry for simply diverting you to another document but I believe that the behavior will be described there.
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/specs/pim-autorp-spec01.txt
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/autorp.html
Best regards,
Peter
08-13-2012 06:09 AM
Hi,
thank you for your reply. I have found the answers minutes ago..... I turn on debug ip pim auto-rp and found that my router1 did not receive RP announcement from router2, whereas router2 receivee RP announcement from itself as well as from router1. the reason why router1 loopback address is the RP despite lower than router1 loopback address because there is no RP announcement to challenge the election. Thanks again for looking into this....
05-18-2018 01:44 AM - edited 05-18-2018 01:45 AM
Hi Peter,
could you please check the path to those shared docs? (i get error, when clicking on it)
I've got more questions regarding auto-rp and can't reach them.
I believe the info I am searching for is right there.
for speed check:
Are 224.0.1.39/40 subject to RPF? (just confirming)
If I receive disco msg about the same group from 2 routers, which one will be used (info-source)?
(whats the process? curretly info source is flapping between 2 routers, how to make one of them primary?)
Thank you
Regards
LG
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide