02-02-2012 02:56 AM - edited 03-07-2019 04:42 AM
Olla,
was actually reading up on route summarization and i just got myself all confused. the question goes thus:
Summarize the following range:
10.16.31.0/24
10.16.32.0/24
10.16.33.0/24
10.16.34.0/24
10.16.35.0/24
10.16.36.0/24
10.16.37.0/24
10.16.38.0/24
10.16.39.0/24
10.16.40.0/24
After my calculations i supposed the answer would be 10.16.0.0/18 but the exercise said my answer was wrong coz of watsed addresses. Can anyone clarify or explain this?? and also provide more examples i can refer back to.
Regards,
DJ.
02-02-2012 12:15 PM
Hi,
You can summarise 32.0 through to 39.255 quite nicely using 10.16.32.0 /21 (8 networks). Then you need to add the individual /24's that can not fit within a summary without summarising networks you do not own.
Do you understand my logic here or shall I expand further? Please don't hesitate to ask.
10.16.31.0/24 - Individual /24
10.16.32.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.33.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.34.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.35.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.36.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.37.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.38.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.39.0/24 - Part of 32.0/21
10.16.40.0/24 - individual /24
Regards,
Jamie
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
02-06-2012 10:13 AM
Hi Dj
Here is binary translaion of the third octet:
31 - | 00011111 |
32 - | 00100000 |
33 - | 00100001 |
34 - | 00100010 |
35 - | 00100011 |
36 - | 00100100 |
37 - | 00100101 |
38 - | 00100110 |
39 - | 00100111 |
40 - | 00101000 |
So you can see that addresses from 32 to 39 (first 5 bits of the third octet are the same 00100 ) can be summarized under the same prefix 21.
Addresses 31 and 40 should be dvertised separately.
By reducing mask size you will include unused networks whic will be wasted.
HTH,
Alex
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide