12-07-2010 10:24 PM - edited 03-06-2019 02:24 PM
Hi All
I would like to know if this scenario works if not please let me know what need to be corrected.
Design as shown in attached diagram.
Distribution switch -connected to 3560---and conected to 2950 access switch .
A van 777 is created in distribution switch and that VLan is exteded to 2nd switch 3560
Distribution has route pointing to 3560 to reach the subnet 10.0.0.0/24
No I will make one of the interface Gi/25 in 3560 as routed port with an ip 10.0.0.1/24.
I connect Gi/25 to the access switch 2950 fa 0/24.
3560 has routing pointing back to Distribution
2950 config as below
Has default vlan 1 with an ip 10.0.0.34/24.
Users behind 2950 has gateway of 10.0.0.1/24
fa 0/24 is set with default config (do i need to place this interface in Vlan 777 / or do i need delete vlan 1 and create vlan 777 in 2950)
Please help, thanks in advance
12-07-2010 10:45 PM
Hi,
There is no attach file, and your describtion is not quite clear.
Could you please elaborate more on your objective?
Regards,
Mohamed
12-08-2010 01:40 AM
msobier123 wrote:
Hi,
There is no attach file, and your describtion is not quite clear.
Could you please elaborate more on your objective?
Regards,
Mohamed
Oops, sorry Mohammed, i read the first line of your answer and skipped the 2nd so i have kind of repeated your post.
It is confusing as to what is trying to be achieved.
Jon
12-08-2010 01:39 AM
It would also help to know exactly what you are trying to do. If you simply want connectivity for the clients connected to the 2950 then there are much easier (and better) ways to do this than what you are proposing.
Jon
12-08-2010 04:44 AM
Thanks guys for your response.
The diagram is attached.
The aim is pc behind 2950 need to talk to outside.
before there was a firewall in path as in diagram . and now i want to remove the firewall , So i am using the same ip which was configured for FW to 3560 switch one interface (routed interface ) so that i can given the same ip as default gateway for the users .
So the idea is we should not make any changes on 2950 . as users should not feel the firewall is removed is that possible , or do i need to make any changes in 2950 ?
Please advice and let me know if you need more information
Thanks in advance
12-08-2010 05:03 AM
Hi,
It should work this way without any change but your 3560 won't replace a fw like PIX or ASA or even a zbf firewall.
Why were you having a fw between 2950 and 4500?
Regards.
12-08-2010 05:22 AM
Hi cadetalain
Thanks for your quick response
yes thats okay i dont need a FW feature now .
now could you please clarify me these doupts to understand it better
1.Will it matter that 2950 is vlan 1 and 3560 is in different vlan if not that how the communication happens, is there any doc i can refer to
2.How the communication happens between a router port (3560 fa0/5 ) L3 and 2950 fa 0/24 L2
3.can you also please tell me what would be the interface config on 2950 fa0/24
do i need make 2950 fa0/24 as access switch port mode access
do i need assigne 2950 fa0/24 to vlan 1 / vlan 777 ?is the default-ip command requied ?
Thanks in advance
12-08-2010 07:13 AM
Hi,
1) no but to communicate with Vlan777 you'll have to create int vlan777 and give it an ip address on your 3560
2) if you want to communicate with your 2950 then the routed port on 3560 is on same subnet as int vlan1 on 2950 and so
communication is ok
From your PCs perspective all they need is a default gw to communicate with vlan777
3) ip default-gateway on 2950 is needed if you want to communicate between int vlan1 outside of vlan1( for administration )
But you could leave switchport on 3560 create int vlan1 with ip add 10.0.0.1 and put the link between 2950 and 3560 as access port in vlan 1
and then also create vlan777 on 3560.
12-08-2010 07:25 AM
Hi ,
Thanks a lot , Hope i cam not confusing you
Currently Vlan 777 on 3560 is on diff subnet 10.1.0.0/24
Routed interface fa0/5 on 3550 is on a diff subnet 10.0.0.1/24 (2850 is on this subnet )
No the pc will have a gateway of Routed interface fa0/5 ip address .
so in this set up will the pc be able to communicate with vlan 777 network which is my aim
12-08-2010 07:59 AM
For machines in vlan777 to communicate with machines in vlan1 you must have int vlan 1 on your 2950, int vlan777 on 3560.
def gw for vlan 1 is int vlan1 and for vlan 777 is int vlan777.
Regards.
12-08-2010 09:14 AM
Regarding your statement
so if I understand it correctly
3650#
interface vlan 777
ip address
2950
interface vlan 1
ip adddress
and default gate way respectivly.
.So now could you please help me to provide a good doc when i can read more about this communication
just want to know when the packet from 2950 with vlan 1 tag comes to 3650 routed interface what happend how actuall the vlan1 tag change to vlan 777.
Thanks in advance
12-08-2010 09:20 AM
Hi
And in addition if i configure ip helpper address(for DHCP) on the routed interface of 3560,
Hope I dont have to make any further change ,All config which you said will remain the same ?
Thanks
12-08-2010 11:27 AM
I would configure ip-helper on interface vlan1.
Regards.
12-08-2010 06:38 PM
If you are just connecting the 2950 to the 3560 on vlan 777 or a routed port from the 3560 , if you are not trunking other vlans down to the 2950 the vlan on the 2950 can be anything you want or just leave it in vlan 1 . From a troubleshooting perspective and knowledge point of view its probably best you make the 2950 vlan 777 with alll ports in vlan 777 though this is "not" required to make it work .
12-12-2010 02:52 AM
Hi cadetalain and glen.grant
Thank you so much for clarifying my doupts on this . I may implement this configuration by end of jan 11 . So I will update you the status on this .
Thanks again for your valuable time on this.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide