02-18-2014 03:39 AM - edited 03-07-2019 06:16 PM
Hi All,
Currently one of my client is using single ASR 1000 as its WAN core. Branhces have 2 ISPs, and both these ISPs are connected to this ASR. Now since its a single point of failure, we need to introduce another ASR 1000. But i am getting confused as how to design it. Shall i
What is the better design ? i tried looking at cisco validated designs but dont knw which document to look for
02-18-2014 05:29 AM
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html
I think this can help you.
02-18-2014 07:27 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
If the device doesn't support hardware redundancy, then common solution is to use a second device. So, using a second router, for the 2nd ISP, would be a common approach. BTW, although you're using an ASR 1k now, the second device could be some other kind of device.
If you install a second HQ device, don't forget you want, if possible, not have other single points of failure. For example, if both devices only connect to the same switch, and it doesn't support hardware redundancy, failure of that switch would drop you WAN.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide