08-14-2013 04:56 AM - edited 03-07-2019 02:55 PM
Router A ------------ Switch A -------------- Access Point 1 ------------ Access Point 2 -------------- Switch B ------------ Router B
Above is my topology design, two branches are connected through access points.Router A is able to ping Router B but they are not able to form neighbourship if I run any protocol and before that Router B even does not show switch B through CDP neigbour command.
Following is the configuration of Router B's interface connected to Switch B, access list on the router & nat commands.
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 78.93.41.217 255.255.255.248 secondary
ip address 192.168.17.10 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip route-cache flow
duplex auto
speed auto
access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 10 permit 192.168.17.0 0.0.0.255
ip nat inside source list 10 pool no-overload overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.240 22 78.93.41.220 22 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.240 1300 78.93.41.220 1300 extendable
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 78.93.41.221
configuration of Router A's interface connected to Switch A
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.229 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
Can anybody please get me out of this problem.Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-15-2013 12:47 AM
I would not get too bogged down with CDP - you have said that the switches are managed so you can't definitely say that CDP is enabled on switch B. Bear in mind that when you form a routing protocol adjacency you may use either broadcast or multicast packets - so a ping may work but if you don't control the bit in the middle you can not be sure that all packets are passed. You could try creating a BGP relationship between the routers as this uses directed unicast. If that works then the issue is in the bit in the middle.
08-15-2013 03:28 AM
Switches on both sides are ESW 520 and cdp is enable by default on this switch and the access points model is RDL-2000.
08-15-2013 05:15 AM
The ESW 520 is manageable. Did you follow the quick start guide? Did you connect the router to an uplink port?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDsQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco.com%2Fen%2FUS%2Fdocs%2Fswitches%2Flan%2Fcsbms%2Fesw500%2Fquick_start%2Fguide%2FESW_500_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf&ei=SsQMUpHMMbH8yAGhvoHoBw&usg=AFQjCNGYDpCi797n-ZKpG0...
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
08-15-2013 05:52 AM
I take it that he meant that he does not have management access to the switches rather than they *can't* be managed. Did you try what I suggested regarding BGP Shahzad?
08-15-2013 05:58 AM
not yet, i will try in the evening and update you.thanks
08-15-2013 10:31 AM
thanks mfunival
routers are exchanging routes via bgp.
rgds
shahzad
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide