Routing capabilities Cat6807 - Sup6T versus ASR1000-X series
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-19-2017 06:44 AM - edited 03-08-2019 10:39 AM
Does someone know how the routing capabilities on the Sup6T relates to the routing capabilities on a ASR 100x-X router
For instance I would like to compare Sup6T with AS1001-X with ethernet ports. Things like:
Size of the routing table ?
# of routing sessions ?
# mGRE tunnels ?
# VRF instances ?
....
- Labels:
-
Other Switching
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-19-2017 07:03 AM
Not sure if you will get those exact details in the docs but have a look at these data sheets you may find more online but these generally contain what the device can do
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/catalyst-6800-series-supervisor-engine-6t/datasheet-c78-736408.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731632.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-19-2017 08:44 AM
In general, beyond what Mark posted, the ASR will have more features than a sup6T. Some resource limits on the ASR may be larger than the sup6T as the former doesn't rely on special hardware as much as does the latter. Resources for the sup6T will also depend on which variant you dealing with, i.e. the base or XL versions.
The sup6T has a much, much (much) higher bandwidth and forwarding capacity vs. an ASR1001-X.
