12-08-2011 10:50 AM - edited 03-07-2019 03:48 AM
Hi,
I am having an odd problem with SNMP, I have a Pair of Nexus 5548 UP's and the SNMP is setup very simply v2 with a RO communitee string, I had both devices setup on my SNMP NMS and after a few days one of the devices stopped responding to SNMP, I have verified and re-entered the settings and still it does not work. I am using a SNMP testing tool as well, works flawless on one but fails on the other. I have full connectivity to both devices as well.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-04-2012 03:56 PM
Hi Jerry
I had similar issue as Jason.
the version on nexus is 5.0(3)N2(1)
It looks to me that snmp had been hanged for a while
dcassw202# sh processes cpu sort
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 1Sec Process
----- ----------- -------- ----- ------ -----------
4565 1308 3838622539 0 46.5% snmpd
4681 184 90 2045 5.0% netstack
4476 1054 14064363 0 1.0% pfma
Your any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks
01-04-2012 07:00 PM
Hi George,
I believe you are hitting the following bug
You can upgrade to 5.0(3)N2(2b).
Regards,
jerry
12-09-2011 06:48 AM
simple question can the device that is failing ping the snmp collector?? Also what is the SNMP timeout period you have configured on the collector?
12-09-2011 08:52 AM
Hello Andrew,
Thanks for the respones, the failing Nexus 5548 can indeed ping the SNMP collector, and I am using Solarwinds which by default the timeout period is 2500ms
12-09-2011 09:03 AM
Also, I am running a Debug SNMP all command on both devices, the failing device has this:
snmpd: pm_snmp_process_ethernet_counters_n_update_cache: error: statcl_parse_all_intf_mod_msg failed
I wonder how to fix?
12-09-2011 07:07 PM
What version of NX-OS are you running on these 5548s???
Regards,
jerry
01-04-2012 03:56 PM
Hi Jerry
I had similar issue as Jason.
the version on nexus is 5.0(3)N2(1)
It looks to me that snmp had been hanged for a while
dcassw202# sh processes cpu sort
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 1Sec Process
----- ----------- -------- ----- ------ -----------
4565 1308 3838622539 0 46.5% snmpd
4681 184 90 2045 5.0% netstack
4476 1054 14064363 0 1.0% pfma
Your any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks
01-04-2012 07:00 PM
Hi George,
I believe you are hitting the following bug
You can upgrade to 5.0(3)N2(2b).
Regards,
jerry
01-10-2012 10:38 AM
I succesfully upgraded to the latest firmware and my issues have been resolved.
thanks for your comments and help
01-04-2012 07:30 PM
thanks Jerry for quick response.
"Workaround:
Unload the BRIDGE-MIB from the switch by using snmp server commands. If the switch is reloaded
you will have to redo step 1 as this command is not persistent. For detailed information on the
workaround please contact Cisco TAC. "
Regarding to temporary workaround, do I need to disable snmp and enable snmp back on the switch to solve this issue?
Regards
01-04-2012 07:41 PM
Hi George,
Disable SNMP will not fix this problem, you have to unload the BRIDGE-MIB to free up the memory. However, per the bug's release note, this information needs to come from TAC only.
Regards,
jerry
01-04-2012 09:55 PM
Hi Jerry,
the workaround solved my problem. Now snmp is back working now.
Thanks for help
Regards
01-05-2012 07:00 AM
Hi George,
Did you unload the BRIDGE-MIB? If yes, just FYI, this is setting will not persist if the switch is reloaded. You have to do this command everytime after reload.
Regards,
jerry
01-04-2012 03:45 PM
Hi Jason,
I had similar issues on nexus about snmp.
I wonder whether you have solutions on it.
thanks
01-04-2012 11:16 PM
Hi George,
I am also facing the same issue with SNMP monitoring for Nexus 5596UP. I am using Solarwinds NPM 10.1.3 for monitoring and it was monitoring fine until I upgraded to v10.2. Solarwinds TAC suspected an issue with Nexus.
Can you let me know the workaround which solved the issue with SNMP monitoring?
TIA
AJ
01-05-2012 02:56 PM
the wo:
1. Unload the BRIDGE-MIB from the switch by using the command "no snmp-server load-mib dot1dbridgesnmp"
2. Verify it is not loaded by using the command "show snmp internal all_loaded_mibs | include bridge"
3. If the switch is reloaded you will have to redo step 1 as this command is not persistent.
Please remember that this is temporary solution. If the switches being reloaded, you need implementing the commands again
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide