12-30-2024 06:47 AM - edited 12-30-2024 07:14 AM
Gi1/1/1 Root FWD 20000 128.49 P2p
Po1 Desg FWD 2000 128.2281 P2p
both are connected to the root bridge, which is a pair of 9500's. with each port connected to a different switch. G1/1/1 goes to core 1, with g1/1/2 going to core 2. trying to move them both to po1
Shouldn't the lowest cost be the root port?
I want to make the root port the port channel, so I can seamlessly add g1/1/1 to the port channel without spanning tree recalculating and taking the link down.
12-30-2024 08:56 AM
12-30-2024 09:19 AM - edited 12-30-2024 09:28 AM
Are you saying that you have below scenario, where the 2960 in your case is a 9200 and the 3560 is 9500. The 9500 is in stackwise virtual but the 9200 even though connected with two interface to the 9500 have both interface in forward?
If you run the command
spanning-tree vlanX root primary on the 9500 it will be the root for Vlan 6 and the interface to be blocked must be on the 9200
12-30-2024 09:25 AM
12-30-2024 09:27 AM - edited 12-30-2024 09:29 AM
Are you 100% sure the 9500 is stackwise virtual?
I can simulate this even in PacketTracer with zero error
12-30-2024 10:32 AM - edited 12-30-2024 10:39 AM
Hello
fyi -i have not read the whole history of the OP - however looking at your initial request and the stp root port output
if you desire the PO1 to be root port you can do this changing the stp port- priority to a lower value (ie 64) to the opposite interface PC that you show -meaning the other side of the connection
int port xx
spanning-tree vlan x port-priority 64
12-30-2024 11:26 AM
12-30-2024 11:55 AM
This has been solved. The cabling guys ran the cables to the wrong ports so the vlans were mismatched on the port channels.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide