cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3547
Views
0
Helpful
47
Replies

Stacking Switch

jain.manish94
Spotlight
Spotlight

Hello 

in stacking switch i am getting mismatch error. what to do...

2      master     0001.2223.2225.5556    5      ready

4      member   0003.565.56588             5      sdm mismatch

47 Replies 47

No licenses are bound to the serial number of the device , only licenses for the specific serial number should be added to the device they cannot work on other devices

Here is doc on how to install licenses for 3k switches and how there obtained through Cisco and applied to the switch , you will need a PAK off Cisco license team that's the first step if you have not got 1

the command is just license install its in the doc how to do it but you need the actual license first bound to your serial number

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3560-x-series-switches/white_paper_c11-579326.html

Please can you describe about these lines

Apr 4 16:49:15.670: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/12 has bad crc
Apr 4 16:49:15.670: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi1/0/12, putting Gi1/0/12 in err-disable state
Apr 4 17:16:09.337: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/13 has bad crc
Apr 4 17:16:09.337: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi1/0/13, putting Gi1/0/13 in err-disable state
Apr 4 17:17:29.227: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/13 has bad crc
Apr 4 17:18:05.716: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/12 has bad crc

Core issue

The error message looks similar to this:

%GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port [dec] has bad crc.

This message means that the Gigabit Interface Converter (GBIC) module is identified as a Cisco GBIC module, but it does not have a valid cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in the EEPROM data. [dec] is port number or the interface in which the module is installed.

Even if the GBIC module is unrecognized by the system, the GBIC module can still operate properly, but it has limited functionality.

This problem is also termed cosmetic, indicated in Cisco bug ID
CSCse25214.

Note: Cisco-approved Small Form-factor Pluggable (SFP) modules have a serial EEPROM that contains the module serial number, the vendor name and ID, a unique security code, and CRC. When an SFP module is inserted in the switch, the switch software reads the EEPROM to verify the serial number, vendor name and vendor ID, and recompute the security code and CRC. If the serial number, the vendor name or vendor ID, the security code, or CRC is invalid, the software generates the security error message and possibly places the interface in an error-disabled state.

Resolution

In order to resolve this, verify that the software release that runs on the system supports the GBIC module. If the GBIC module is newer, a system software upgrade is possibly required.

for this what commands i run and collect information...

is it a cisco gbic or 3rd party gbic?

did it work before ?

its not a command its whether its supported or not with the device you have it installed in , you could try reseat it if too if it was working before 32e

Hello 

good morning 

please tell me step by step if i get these problem what i do please tell me point by point. 

Switch#   Role    Mac Address     Priority Version  State

------------------------------------------------------------

*1       Active   0041.d259.ec80     1      V06     Ready

2       Member   3820.5623.1600     1      0       Lic-Mismatch

Switch#   Role    Mac Address     Priority Version  State

------------------------------------------------------------

*1       Active   0041.d259.ec80     1      V06     Ready

2       Member   3820.5623.1600     1      0       VM-Mismatch

Switch#   Role    Mac Address     Priority Version  State

------------------------------------------------------------

*1       Active   0041.d259.ec80     1      V06     Ready

2       Member   3820.5623.1600     1      0       SDM-Mismatch

hello Mark, 

how are you , 

good afternoon, 

are u busy 

Hello 

difference between StackWise Plus ports and StackWise ports.

and suppose i need some licences in WLC to connect AP . what i do .

if i  upgrade wireless lan controller image so it is enough for licences also or any other i need. please reply on both question ...

Hello Mark, 

good morning, 

how are you 

are u busy these days.?

Hello please can you tell me what is the problem here

Apr 28 23:04:35.225: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te6/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -25.2 dBm, Threshold value: -18.4 dBm.
Apr 28 23:14:35.317: %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te5/2: Rx power low alarm; Operating value: -26.7 dBm, Threshold value: -18.4 dBm.

Hello Mark , 

hawa you , 

are u busy 

Hello Everyone 

what does this mean

spantree-2-Loopguard_unblock:loop guard unblocking port gi4/26 on vlan0008

spantree-2-Loopguard_Block:Loop guard blocking port gi 4/26 on vlan0008 

Please reply 

You will get a lot more replies from users if you open new incidents for new problems/alerts

the alert you seen there can be caused by unidirectional link detection , can be caused by a cable failure or by no bpdus were seen coming into the interface but it looks to have tresolved itself

you can check if there is still an issue with command show spanning-tree inconsistentports

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/spanning-tree-protocol/10596-84.html#loop_guard

Cisco

STP Loop Guard

Feature Description

The STP loop guard feature provides additional protection against Layer 2 forwarding loops (STP loops). An STP loop is created when an STP blocking port in a redundant topology erroneously transitions to the forwarding state. This usually happens because one of the ports of a physically redundant topology (not necessarily the STP blocking port) no longer receives STP BPDUs. In its operation, STP relies on continuous reception or transmission of BPDUs based on the port role. The designated port transmits BPDUs, and the non-designated port receives BPDUs.

When one of the ports in a physically redundant topology no longer receives BPDUs, the STP conceives that the topology is loop free. Eventually, the blocking port from the alternate or backup port becomes designated and moves to a forwarding state. This situation creates a loop.

The loop guard feature makes additional checks. If BPDUs are not received on a non-designated port, and loop guard is enabled, that port is moved into the STP loop-inconsistent blocking state, instead of the listening / learning / forwarding state. Without the loop guard feature, the port assumes the designated port role. The port moves to the STP forwarding state and creates a loop.

When the loop guard blocks an inconsistent port, this message is logged:

  • CatOS

    %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARDBLOCK: No BPDUs were received on port 3/2 in vlan 3. Moved to
     loop-inconsistent state.
  • Cisco IOS

    %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARD_BLOCK: Loop guard blocking port FastEthernet0/24 on 
    VLAN0050.

Once the BPDU is received on a port in a loop-inconsistent STP state, the port transitions into another STP state. According to the received BPDU, this means that the recovery is automatic and intervention is not necessary. After recovery, this message is logged:

  • CatOS

    %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARDUNBLOCK: port 3/2 restored in vlan 3.
  • Cisco IOS

    %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARD_UNBLOCK: Loop guard unblocking port FastEthernet0/24 on 
    VLAN0050.

Please tell me this last question here then i will open new discussion 

1. How to check Stacking switch configuration on cisco 3850 series switch 

ex. i have one switch  with 3 stack switch , total 4 switch are in stacking . now i want to check 3rd and 4th switch running configuration from master switch . i mean i want to check the configuration of Standby switch and member switch 

Please reply...............

Hi

the command to check all switches are in the stack and formed correctly ---

show switch detail

sh version will also show you the uptime of each switch in the stack