03-27-2019 09:22 AM
Good day, I am a bit confused on how to configure my switch. My topology consists of three switches connected together. One switch will be a distribution switch then the other two will be access switches. I have three servers connected to the switches, general personnel, and accounts. Then I also have three pcs connected to the same switch. I have a router connected to my switch for DHCP purposes. I have the router connected through the gigabit port and then its pushing addresses out to the pcs. What I am currently trying to configure is that one pc called IT support should only be able to access the accounts server. and the next PC called accounts should only be able to access the accounts server. But I don't know exactly what I would put in place to block the other pc's from gaining access to the servers they aren't supposed to.
03-27-2019 09:44 AM
You have told us a little but not enough for us to be able to give you good advice. You mention a distribution switch and 2 access switches. But you do not indicate whether these are layer 2 only or are layer 3/layer 2. You do not tell us whether all the network is in a single vlan/single subnet or whether there are multiple vlans/multiple subnets.If there are multiple subnets you have not told us which device is providing routing between the subnets. If you can give us better information we may be able to give you better advice.
HTH
Rick
03-27-2019 09:53 AM
03-27-2019 10:02 AM
Thank you for the clarification that the switches are layer 2 switches. So am I correct in assuming that routing between vlans/subnets is provided by the router you mention? It is good to know that your network has 4 vlans and 4 subnets. You mention 2 PCs that should only be able to access the accounts server. Does that mean that they have no other access at all (no Internet, etc)? Can you clarify the assignment of the PCs and the server for vlan and for subnet?
HTH
Rick
03-27-2019 10:08 AM
Thank you for posting the drawing. It shows a topology more complex that what was described in the original post. Would I be correct in assuming that this discussion deals with the part of that network on the left side of the drawing?
The drawing does show devices identifying their names and the ports on which they are connected. But it does not supply information about their vlan assignment or the subnetting/IP assignment. Can you provide clarification on this?
HTH
Rick
03-27-2019 10:18 AM
@Richard Burts This is the network with the addresses.
03-27-2019 11:02 PM
@Richard Burts wrote:
Thank you for posting the drawing.
Rick,
I've seen this drawing before. It was for a schoolwork/homework.
03-28-2019 06:01 AM
Leo
I had wondered about that. Thanks for confirming.
HTH
Rick
03-27-2019 10:09 AM
03-27-2019 10:26 AM
Hi @ndaneluk ,
Effectively, to be able to make connectivity filters you must segment the network through vlan and subinterfaces in the router.
This is because all the devices (PCs and Servers) are in the same vlan, the packets are propagated by layer 2, without the possibility of applying filters.
Regards
03-27-2019 10:30 AM
Here is the Packet Tracer. @luis_cordova
03-27-2019 12:20 PM - edited 03-27-2019 12:22 PM
Hi @ndaneluk ,
I attached the exercise with the following filters:
-PC Support has ping to all devices
-PC Personal only access the Personal server
-PC Accounts only access the Accounts server
Obviously, check the ACL that I configured (each ACL has a marked description)
Anyway, I recommend you to reinforce your knowledge of Vlan, Routing Protocols, Router-on-a-stick method.
As always, if you have any questions or concerns, you should only post it in the community and we will try to help you.
Regards
03-27-2019 10:51 AM - edited 03-27-2019 10:55 AM
Hello
@ndaneluk wrote:
I currently don't have any VLANs in place because I'm still trying to figure out if they are needed or not
Your topology is rather convoluted, I am correct in saying this isnt a production network you have simulated here?
The 5 routers you have , do they have any configuration on them as they show in their description has "empty"
Looks like you currently have 4 subnets running so going forward you would like 4 vlans related to those subnets, is so the next the question I guess is can this topology be redesigned to include just 1 rtr and the 4 switches?
03-27-2019 11:00 AM
03-27-2019 11:22 AM
I am still not clear about some aspects of your design. But one thing is extremely clear. As Luis indicated in a previous response if you want to enforce restrictions on what PCs can access what servers then you need to have multiple vlans (and multiple subnets) in your design. If PCs and servers are in the same vlan/same subnet it is extremely difficult to control who accesses what.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide